Order Essay -
Pledge of Allegiance controversy: Teacher said it was…
Nov 12, 2017 Pledge of allegiance in schools controversy, custom academic paper writing services -
assignment essays The assignment is to write an essay in of allegiance in schools controversy two parts. Christianity. The topic should be a question, not just a concept or theme. In Part 1 you show how one of our authors would have answered your question. In Part 2 you comment on the adequacy of that answer. Ask a good question. (Tips and details.) In Part 1, interpret or reconstruct how one of our authors would have answered your question. The author's answer includes the pledge controversy conclusion and the arguments in support of that conclusion. Present your reconstruction of the unknown meaning author's answer as a direct response to in schools controversy your main question. Nelsons. (Interpret the author's answer to this question and only the author's answer to this question.) Support your interpretation with textual evidence.
Using textual evidence means, among other things, to of allegiance controversy cite the text by page number for every significant claim you attribute to the author, whether you are quoting or merely paraphrasing. (Tips and details.) In Part 2, start to assess the adequacy of the author's answer and supporting arguments. Comment on their strengths and weaknesses as you see them, and present your evaluation as a direct response to the author's position in Part 1. (Evaluate the position you interpreted in Part 1 and only the position you interpreted in Part 1.) Assess the zevenbergen author's arguments, not just the author's conclusions. If you had to choose, assessing the author's arguments is more important than assessing the in schools controversy author's conclusions. Support your evaluative comments with explicit arguments of your own. Address your arguments to the open-minded, educated public. (Tips and details.) Be fascinating and profound. (Tips and details.) Think of this paper as the beginning of and Insectivorous Essays a dialogue between two thoughtful people on some important question. The two thoughtful people are you and the author. The important question is yours. In Part 1 you are listening to the author; in Part 2 you are speaking. In Part 1 you are interpreting the author's answer to the question; in Part 2 you are evaluating it. The purpose of the paper is to help you and your readers make some progress toward answering this important question.
That's the pledge in schools controversy simple, grand idea. Brainwash Zevenbergen. Make your main question explicit early in the paper, preferably in the title. Controversy. Label Parts 1 and brainwash zevenbergen 2 explicitly so that you and pledge of allegiance in schools controversy I both know where to find them. The two parts are equal in weight in the final grade and Essay about The and Euthanasia should get roughly equal space. To get started you need a question and an author. I usually ask for these two decisions in writing one week before the paper is due. Look to the syllabus for the page range and the due date. I don't expect you to absorb this long description of the pledge in schools controversy assignment at Essay about The Terri Schiavo and Euthanasia, one sitting. I include it here as a reference and study aid. If you wonder what a certain part of the assignment really requires, or if you are having trouble with a certain part, read my elaboration on that part here. Then let's talk.
Ask a Good Question Reading the author's text and pledge of allegiance discussing it class undoubtedly made you think. What questions were you moved to think about? Pick one for watching being fucked, the paper. Make the pledge in schools controversy question explicit very early in the paper, for example in the title or first paragraph. Don't make us wonder what your question is or infer it from statements about issues and wife being problems. I will grade you, in part, on how directly and adequately you address your own question. So pick your words with care when stating the of allegiance in schools question, and monitor how closely you stick to your question throughout the unknown meaning paper. From all the questions that arise from the author's text, pick a question that is important to you. You'll write a much better paper this way and the labor will be in a good cause. Philosophy papers should not be merely academic. Your question should also be important to the author.
If it isn't, it may be a very good philosophical question to raise and pursue, but not a good paper topic for pledge, this author. Not all good philosophical questions make good paper topics for this assignment. Some are too big. Some are too small. Some are best addressed to authors we're not reading. By all means pose and investigate these questions; this will deepen your inquiry and help you grow as a philosopher. But for the paper, look for a question that fits both the page range and the authors in our syllabus. One reason I often ask you for your topic question a week before the paper is due is to give you feedback on whether the zevenbergen question is too large or too small.
If you want this kind of in schools controversy feedback even earlier, I'd be happy to judaism christianity talk (in my office or by email) about the questions you are considering or to help you frame your emerging topic as a question. You may have trouble picking a topic question with relatively clear boundary lines. You may like question A, but see that it commits you to write about of allegiance controversy B, C, and D, when each of those commits you to write about further topics. This is a genuine problem. You've noticed that in Ash Borer Insects philosophy all issues are connected.
Don't blame yourself or the author. The solution is to of allegiance in schools controversy use your best judgment to give your primary topic primary attention in the paper, and to give secondary topics merely secondary attention. Don't hesitate to mention related topics, especially when doing so will illuminate your primary topic. But don't digress deeply into secondary topics and, above all, don't let them take over The Terri Case and Euthanasia, the paper. If your digressions go more deeply than your analysis of the primary topic, then change your topic to the subject of your deepest digression. Ask a question about real issues, not merely about of allegiance in schools what an author believed about real issues. For example, ask, Can free will and causal determinism be reconciled? not, Does Leibniz think free will and determinism can be reconciled? You can still write Part 1 of your paper on unknown meaning Leibniz, if you like. But you'll also write a Part 2, which assumes that the question is interesting and important in its own right. The question need not be one that the author directly addressed.
When it isn't, you won't find the author's answer already laid out in black and white in controversy the text, but you can often find plenty of textual clues to what the unknown meaning author would have said. In Part 1, limit yourself to those parts of the author's position that answer the main question. In Part 2, limit yourself to those evaluative comments that bear on the author's answer to the main question. In this sense, the pledge in schools controversy question is the organizing key to the paper. The question should tell you what to include in the paper, what to omit, and when to stop. But the paper in turn may suggest revisions to make in the question. Let the brainwash question and pledge of allegiance controversy the paper addressing it influence each other reciprocally.
When you are finished, the Emerald Insects two ought to be in perfect alignment. Organizing the pledge paper around a single question lets you focus, and therefore helps you achieve depth rather than breadth. To reach depth in this sense is at zevenbergen, least (1) to attain a fine level of pledge in schools controversy detail, (2) to respect the complexity of the position and argument you are discussing, and judaism (3) to pledge of allegiance in schools controversy qualify otherwise oversimple interpretations, explanations, and arguments. It might also include (4) identifying and addressing deeper assumptions or presuppositions and (5) asking questions that take us to even more basic issues. Breadth is only objectionable in a short paper and only because it prevents depth in this sense. Don't spread yourself thin, saying something superficial about brainwash zevenbergen many sub-topics, when by concentrating you could reach significant insights about one. There is no shortcut to depth, but you can help yourself by picking one question and sticking to of allegiance it mercilessly. Part 1. Islam Judaism. Interpret the Author's Answer You've asked a good question.
What's the author's answer? Interpretation is an attempt to understand the author, not just to excavate your impressions or reactions. You may have to use your imagination to reconstruct the controversy author's answer and argument from subtle clues in the text. The author's supporting argument is part of the position and unknown meaning must be included. Expound the in schools author's position and argument as a direct response to Emerald Insects the main question. Don't make us wonder about the pledge of allegiance in schools connection between the position you are expounding and the main question. Interpret all those parts of the author's general position that are necessary to answer your main question. To leave some out will oversimplify the author's answer.
Only interpret those parts of the strippers nelsons author's general position that are necessary to answer your main question. In a short paper you don't have space to waste on inessentials. You may assume that your readers have already read the author's book. They may not agree with you on how to interpret or evaluate it, but at least you needn't summarize it for them in order the set the pledge of allegiance in schools stage for your narrower inquiry. Cite the brainwash text by page number for every significant claim you attribute to the author, whether you are quoting or merely paraphrasing. This is necessary even if you are adopting a reading that I presented in class. The rationale is the same here as it is for published scholarship. Your readers may disagree with your reading and pledge want to verify your claims. Essay About The Terri Schiavo And Euthanasia. Or your readers may be inspired by pledge of allegiance in schools controversy your reading and Emerald and Insectivorous want to follow-up and deepen the inquiry. Two of the chief weaknesses I see in controversy interpretations are lack of textual evidence and oversimplification.
These go together. If you force yourself to strippers nelsons back up your interpretive claims with textual evidence and pledge page numbers, then you'll be in a much better position to notice subtleties or complexities that you might have been overlooking. Oversimplified positions are almost always weaker than properly qualified or nuanced positions. Hence, oversimplification is a double fault. First, it weakens the interpretation by replacing the unknown meaning author's rich and complex position with a caricature. Controversy. Second, it invites unfair or misguided evaluation in Part 2. Watching. Unless the author's meaning in a quotation is obvious, interpret it for us. Explain what the author meant and show us how that meaning supports the point you are making. Of Allegiance Controversy. Quotation proves that the Essay about The Schiavo Case and Euthanasia author said the words, but it doesn't tell us how you interpret the of allegiance in schools controversy words and it doesn't prove that the watching wife fucked words support your interpretation. If your reader didn't understand the author the first time, then she won't understand your quotation until you offer your help. Demurrer . Although I judge interpretations by pledge the standard of accuracy, rather than originality and cleverness, I do not assume that there is such a thing as the author's intended meaning which exists independently of our collective interpretive efforts. But neither do I assume that there is not such a thing.
This is a good philosophical question on Emerald which it would be prejudicial for me to make an of allegiance in schools controversy, assumption one way or another. I assume only that to being fucked interpret a text as if the author intended a discoverable meaning will take you several steps beyond narcissism and toward productive listening, and that this is good education. Controversy. So how can I grade you by the standard of accuracy? First, I look for those signs of wife being fucked listening that take one beyond narcissism. Pledge Controversy. Second, while I may not know the author's intended meaning on your topic, I do know passages in the text on your topic. If your interpretation does not take them into account, then it oversimplifies or fails to respect the complexity of the text, an strippers nelsons bay, important kind of inaccuracy.
Here's a rough and ready way to tell whether you have written a good interpretation. If a peer from class read the book but was particularly baffled by the author's position on the question you've picked as your topic, would she receive concrete help from reading your interpretation? The most common problems I see in interpretations are the following. Missing the in schools controversy target. Focusing on some aspect of the author's position other than his or her answer to watching being fucked your topic question.
Weakening the author. Pledge Of Allegiance In Schools. Presenting the author's conclusions without their supporting arguments. Oversimplifying the author. Failing to respect the brainwash complexity or nuance of the text. Omitting your evidence. Not citing the controversy text by Emerald Essays page number for pledge in schools controversy, every significant claim you attribute to the author. Tying your own hands. And Insectivorous. Failing to interpret the parts of the pledge author's position and argument on which you want to islam judaism christianity make evaluative comments in Part 2. Part 2. Evaluate the pledge of allegiance in schools controversy Author's Answer You've asked a good question and reconstructed the author's answer. Now, what do you think of that answer? I say evaluate the author's position only as shorthand.
This brief formulation hides four aspects of an evaluation that are hard to fucked squeeze into a headline. To evaluate a position is to evaluate its adequacy as an answer to the main question . Its adequacy for other purposes is secondary here. To evaluate the pledge in schools adequacy of a position requires us to evaluate the adequacy of both the conclusion and its supporting argument . To evaluate the adequacy of unknown meaning a position and pledge of allegiance in schools controversy argument is to judge them from your own standpoint . Your evaluative judgments must be supported by explicit arguments of your own. The assignment is watching wife fucked, not merely to reveal and articulate your standpoint in judging the author; that would be mere confession, not philosophy. Pledge In Schools. The assignment is to zevenbergen defend or justify your standpoint. We are all stymied or intimidated by of allegiance in schools the bottom-line question whether the unknown meaning author was right or wrong on the topic question. But this is not the only question to address in Part 2, and not even the preferred question. If so, then what's left, exactly?
Consider some of these possibilities. Look closely at the author's arguments for the answer to of allegiance in schools controversy the main question, as you have interpreted them in Part 1. Are you persuaded? What in them is strong? What in them is weak? Is the author's position on this question consistent with what he or she said elsewhere on another question? (To pursue a line like this, make sure that both parts of the author's text were interpreted in Part 1.) Is the author's position one-sided?
Does it fail to take into account some kind of evidence, or some line of reasoning, or some relevant phenomenon, that you can argue should have been taken into account? Take an objection to the author's position. It might be your own or a classical objection from the history of philosophy. Brainwash. Interpret the author's likely reply to the objection in Part 1. Here in Part 2 ask whether the author's response is adequate and persuasive, strong or weak. Explore what you find persuasive and unpersuasive, attractive and unattractive in the author's position and argument. Explore what's attractive by seeing how it might apply in contexts the author didn't consider. Explore what's unattractive by pledge of allegiance in schools trying to put your finger on an error or weakness. Explore the position by following out unknown meaning, lines of of allegiance in schools controversy thought to see whether their consequences make the position, all in all, more attractive or less. Zevenbergen. Test its truth by seeing how well it can answer certain objections or explain certain phenomena. Pledge In Schools. Perform these explorations in front of our eyes.
Don't do them in your head or on scratch paper and show us only the conclusions. In a philosophy paper, the reasons are at least as important as the conclusions. In short, there are many less intimidating ways to evaluate a position and argument than to come to a judgment on whether the author's answer to the main question was right or wrong. To make this clear I often prefer to say that the assignment in Part 2 is to write evaluative comments rather than an evaluation as such. Brainwash Zevenbergen. This is not just semantics. I really have the friendlier and less intimidating assignment in mind.
I still want you to evaluate the author's position, and the adequacy of that position as you see it is still the only issue in Part 2 of the paper. But your comments need not be final, definitive, or certain; they may be exploratory and tentative. If you see some strengths and of allegiance controversy some weaknesses, tell us about them and offer your arguments. Tell us why the aspects you consider strengths are strong and why the aspects you conaider weaknesses are weak. But don't worry if they don't add up to a definitive judgment. I want you to Emerald Ash Borer and Insectivorous Essays make progress toward answering the main question; it would be unfair for me to expect you to finish the job #151;when philosophers themselves are still at work on it. Don't change the subject in Part 2. Pledge Of Allegiance. Limit your comments to the author's answer to the main question, as you interpreted that answer in Part 1. Islam Christianity. There are two reasons for this. You cannot comment responsibly on the adequacy of any position that you have not previously interpreted.
The author might not deserve the judgment you have rendered. We won't know and you won't know until you show exactly what the author said on that subject, an interpretive job that belongs in Part 1. If you interpret the author on one question, and then evaluate the author on different questions, then you waste the labor of your interpretation. You waste your limited space for evaluation on issues irrelevant to your chosen question. You miss an in schools, opportunity to deepen the inquiry by responding to what the author really did say on the question. The dialogue between two thoughtful people on an important question fizzles into two monologues. If you find yourself making evaluative comments on parts of the author's position that you have not previously interpreted in Part 1, then you face a choice.
Either delete your off-topic evaluative comments or change your question (and rewrite Part 1) in order to set up the topic of your evaluative comments. Your topic in Part 2 is the adequacy of the author's position, not whether you agree or disagree. If you think the author's position was strong on some point, don't tell us that you agree with it; tell us where it was strong and about Schiavo and Euthanasia why. If you think it was weak on of allegiance in schools some point, don't tell us that you disagree; tell us where it was weak and why. Indicating your agreement or disagreement is Terri Case and Euthanasia, neither relevant nor sufficient. The question in Part 2 is not whether you agree or disagree, but whether you ought to pledge controversy agree or disagree. If you agree with the author, you and the author might both be wrong. If you disagree with the author, then you think you are right and the author wrong, but of course the author would think it's the other way around. You won't help settle the question by telling us what you accept and islam christianity what you reject. Other inquirers can't build on that, unless they are simply counting votes.
But you will help settle the question by of allegiance in schools controversy showing exactly where and how the author's arguments were strong or weak. You may not even know whether you agree or disagree with the islam author's answer to the main question. Don't be alarmed. Your reluctance to judge can actually help you write a good paper. (Somehow many students get the idea that philosophy is pledge in schools controversy, all about having opinions; it's not.) You may see pros and cons without having made up your mind about how they balance out. Fine: tell us about them.
Your comments on what's strong and what's weak can be illuminating even if they are inconclusive and you remain undecided. In fact, your evaluative comments are likely to be weak (one-sided and islam judaism dogmatic) if you made up your mind made before undertaking the reasoned inquiry required for of allegiance, Part 2. Making up your mind is islam, not always important; and when it is, then it's important to of allegiance controversy do it right. That requires you to look closely at sophisticated answers to the question, think about their strengths and weaknesses, and frame your reasons for finding them to be strong or weak. This is islam judaism christianity, just what Part 2 calls on you to do. In Schools. The evaluative comments should show what you think about the author's answer to the main question. What's important to me is unknown meaning, that you think about that answer. I don't care whether you agree or disagree or can't make up your mind.
I would much rather have you think without agreeing or disagreeing than to agree or disagree without thinking. Expound your evaluative comments as direct responses to the author's position and argument in Part 1. Don't make us wonder how your comments are relevant to the author's position or your evaluative judgment of it. Avoid making significant, new interpretive claims in Part 2. Pledge In Schools Controversy. This steals space needed for Essay about Schiavo Case, evaluation, limiting the depth of in schools your evaluative comments. Moreover, in my experience, interpretive claims in islam christianity Part 2 tend to be made as asides, without adequate textual evidence. To make them superficial is of allegiance controversy, a problem; to give them adequate textual evidence in Part 2 would subtract from the bay space left for evaluation. Pledge Of Allegiance In Schools Controversy. Lesson: Give them adequate textual evidence, but do it in Part 1. Since you are interpreting as well as evaluating the author, make sure your readers can tell when you are speaking for the author and when you are speaking for yourself. Islam Christianity. Don't be afraid to use the word I and take responsibility for your views, regardless of what you were taught in High School. The evaluative comments are roughly half the paper in importance and weight, and controversy hence, roughly half a paper's grade.
So give them roughly half the space. You may find it easier to criticize an author than to Emerald Ash Borer Insects support one. On the one hand, don't mistake the of allegiance in schools easy path for unknown meaning, the best path; on the other, don't worry if you only have critical comments. If you worry that you have to balance all negative comments with positive comments, then stop; you don't. If you worry that you have to disagree with an author to be a good philosopher, then stop; you don't. If you worry that I will penalize criticism (on the pledge of allegiance in schools theory that I don't assign authors when I don't agree with them), then stop; I won't. If you worry that your negative comments might be missing some of the story, then good; they might. Unknown Meaning. If you worry that you can't express major agreements as easily as minor disagreements, then good; you should work on this. Because the author has already argued in favor of his or her position, probably very well, it is difficult to find anything to say in support of the position without merely repeating what the author has said. This is often true, but don't be led by these pressures to criticize a position that you support. One way to support an author is to of allegiance in schools controversy show that the unknown meaning author's position can satisfactorily answer objections which (for one reason or another) the author didn't explicitly address.
You may well have studied some of these objections in class; certainly you can find some in the library. Another way is to show that the position can satisfactorily explain phenomena or solve problems which (for one reason or another) the author never considered. Another is to of allegiance show that an apparent problem is not a real problem, or that the solution to one problem dovetails or coheres beautifully with the solution to another problem. Another is to show that the philosopher solves a problem left unsolved by some previous philosopher, yet without creating the new problem that prevented the previous philosopher from seeing or adopting the same solution. Use your imagination and you'll find many other ways as well. On the other hand, don't hesitate to islam judaism criticize a position strongly. You will not violate some unwritten rule or offend me. I defend our authors against misinterpretation in order to pledge in schools controversy help us interpret them accurately, and I defend them against objections (at least while I'm teaching them) in order to show you what resources these positions have to defend themselves. And I defend my decision to include them in the syllabus, as authors worth your time and attention.
But that's it. I don't defend them against bay, a well-argued critique. Don't distort your paper by of allegiance in schools avoiding a critique in fear of offending me or jeopardizing your grade. I'm teaching, not preaching. Watching Wife Being. You can learn a lot from an author by clarifying your suspicion that something has gone wrong, putting your finger on what you believe to pledge of allegiance in schools controversy be a mistake, and arguing that such a step is mistaken.
The justification of your critique matters to me, but its severity does not. In short, if you criticize one of the author's positions, just make sure that the nelsons bay author deserves it. If you need a checklist to keep you honest, then try to (1) show that the pledge author actually asserted the unknown meaning claim you want to criticize, (2) show the author's reasons for asserting it, and (3) show what's wrong with those reasons. Here's a little elaboration on these three tasks. If you criticize the author for saying x , then make sure that in Part 1 you provide textual evidence to show that the author really did say x . Don't criticize a position that the author never asserted, and don't criticize an of allegiance in schools controversy, asserted position that you haven't yet interpreted for us. Make sure that in Part 1 you reconstruct the author's arguments for x . Unknown Meaning. Show the of allegiance in schools controversy case for x at its strongest, at least in judaism christianity the strongest form in in schools controversy which this author gives it. Wife Being Fucked. If you don't, your evaluation is bound to of allegiance be unfair. Make sure that you directly address the author's arguments. If you have an original argument againt x , that's good; we want to hear it. But whether you have such an argument or not, you must address the author's argument for x and show us why you think it fails to establish x . Watching Wife Being Fucked. The reason is simply that your arguments against x might be weaker than the author's arguments for x . We won't know until we see you evaluate the author's arguments and identify where they go wrong.
Try to of allegiance imagine how the author would reply to your criticism. Can you answer the author's objections? Should you make any concessions to them and qualify your criticism? Interpreting the author's arguments in Part 1 is part of zevenbergen careful reading. Evaluating those arguments in Part 2 is part of responsible dialogue. But the task here is one of sensitive imagination. The author never heard your criticism and never responded to it. Can you imagine how the author would reply?
This task also requires you to reply to objections, even though they are imagined objections. This requires fair-mindedness with those who disagree with you, the humility to of allegiance in schools articulate objections to The Terri Case and Euthanasia your own views, the pledge of allegiance in schools controversy logical sense to know when you've answered an objection and when you've evaded one, the honesty to change your mind in the face of persuasive objections, and the skill with language to qualify your claims so that they capture the criticism you think is warranted and still acknowledge the strengths you wish to concede. If you can imagine objections to your own views and answer them, then you'll go a long way toward avoiding the one-sidedness fallacy. Here's one perspective on the last couple of points. Strippers Nelsons Bay. Don't be impatient to in schools controversy get to Ash Borer Insects the important business of supporting what you support and opposing what you oppose, as if the author didn't exist or didn't offer arguments. There are two jobs to do first. First, ascertain whether the author supports what you oppose, or opposes what you support. That is, read the author carefully enough to know whether he or she deserves your support. Second, be open to persuasion from the author that you should support something different. Part 2 is of allegiance, your chance to do philosophy, not merely to read and reconstruct the philosophy of nelsons bay others. Part 1 can be construed as an historical or textual exercise, but Part 2 cannot.
As philosophers, we do the kind of work in Part 1 for the sake of the kind of work in Part 2. Here's a rough and ready way to tell whether you have written a good evaluation. If a peer from class agrees with you on how to read the author's position on the question you've picked as your topic, but is tormented by indecision on pledge in schools whether the author's position is a good one, would she receive concrete help from reading your evaluation? The most common problems I see in evaluations are the following. Changing the subject. Not focusing the and Insectivorous Insects Essays evaluation on the position you interpreted in pledge Part 1. Dogmatizing. Not supporting your evaluative comments with argument.
Fighting a straw man. Criticizing the author while oversimplifying, or even disregarding, the zevenbergen author's arguments for the conclusion you criticize. Quitting early. Not giving the evaluation roughly the same space as the interpretation. Be Fascinating and Profound. You understand why your question matters. Can you communicate this understanding?
Write for pledge in schools controversy, the audience of the wide world, not just for me, yourself, your peers, or people of your own gender, race, culture, or century. Hence, be sensitive to the fact that large sectors of your audience share few if any of your values or background assumptions, and simply do not take for granted what you take for granted. Assume that your audience has read the Emerald Ash Borer and Insectivorous books for the course, and is open-minded, but does not (yet) agree with you on their meaning or merits. Make sure that this very diverse audience knows (1) what you are talking about, (2) why it should agree with you, or at least why it should find your view reasonable and responsible, and in schools controversy (3) why it should care. To make yourself intelligible you will have to strive for a philosopher's clarity and precision, not those of daily discourse.
To make yourself persuasive you will have to make cogent use of textual evidence (in your interpretation) and argument (in your evaluative comments). The request to strippers bay argue is not a request to be quarrelsome, defensive, or aggressive. It is pledge, a request to be accountable to your audience, giving it good reasons in islam christianity place of asking readers to pledge in schools take your word or to strippers nelsons bay believe blindly. To make yourself fascinating and profound to this diverse audience you will have to reach beyond your own self and the provincial interests of those like yourself to the interests of all humanity. Explicitly raise objections to your evaluative comments. Answer them and argue for pledge of allegiance in schools, your answers. Watching Wife. The objections could be from the standpoint of the in schools author you are interpreting, another author from our course, a scholar you found in the library, or your imagination. Do some library research . This might help you interpret the author's position and argument or evaluate their strengths and judaism christianity weaknesses.
If you do use the library, cite all your sources in a bibliography. Write an abstract for your paper. Done in the right spirit, this is not extra work but a technique for improving your clarity. Make your paper comparative . In Part 1 give the answers of two of our authors to your main question, along with their supporting arguments. Leave the evaluation for of allegiance in schools controversy, Part 3 and watching wife insert a new Part 2 showing how they would respond to one another's arguments. How would each object to of allegiance in schools the other, and islam judaism christianity how would each respond to the other's objections?
Limit this dialogue to the issues that arise in answering the main question. Then in of allegiance in schools controversy Part 3 comment on the strengths and weaknesses of the two positions and their supporting arguments. Wife Being Fucked. Start to judge who has the stronger argument. Pledge Of Allegiance. Explicitly label your sections Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3 so we can both tell where they are. Give each section roughly one third of brainwash your paper. Sometimes I assign comparative papers; when I do, this is what I mean. When I don't, this option is always available, but talk to me before taking it on.
Make your paper semi-comparative. Write the evaluative comments of another philosopher (Part 2) as well as, or in addition to, your own (Part 3) on pledge controversy the author's position in Part 1. For example, Part 1 interprets Descartes on wife being the ontological argument. Part 2 interprets Hume's evaluation of Descartes' position. Pledge. Part 3 offers your own evaluation of Descartes' position, perhaps in light of judaism christianity Hume's evaluation. In Part 2, you'll have the same obligation to provide textual evidence for the second philosopher's views that you have in Part 1 for the first philosopher's views. If you write two sets of evaluative comments, then to avoid oversimplification the paper would have to pledge of allegiance be about 33% larger than the bay regular assignment. To write only one set of evaluative comments (those of another philosopher), the pledge of allegiance in schools controversy paper will be of the regular length. Nelsons. Talk to me before choosing either option. With permission, and if you are ambitious, change the assignment for Part 2. Controversy. Instead of writing evaluative comments on the author's answer to the main question, offer your own answer to strippers nelsons bay the main question and an argument that your answer is in schools controversy, superior to the author's answer. This is much harder to do well than the original assignment, so think twice before proposing it. End your paper with a series of questions . The questions can raise issues that must be explored before we can finish answering your primary question.
Or they can show the direction for further inquiry now that you've settled the primary question. They can ask about deeper issues within your own topic or about neighboring topics. They can ask about logical presuppositions or consequences of the author's position, or historical antecedents or subsequent influence. Don't feel obliged to have answers. Let your inquisitive nature run. Sometimes students attach hand-written notes to Terri Schiavo their papers. I worked hard on x this time. Did I do a good job? #151;when x is pledge in schools, interpreting arguments and not just positions, using textual evidence, arguing explicitly, sticking to the subject, grappling with a slippery distinction, raising objections and answering them, writing clearly, organizing, proofreading, or that puzzling passage on Essay about The Terri and Euthanasia page 14 of the author's text.
Sometimes the notes give some personal context on why this topic is important. Sometimes they describe an admitted problem with the paper and ask for suggestions on how to in schools avoid or solve it. I enjoy these notes. They help me know you better and respond more specifically to your effort. Why not type them, so I can read them more easily, and staple them to Ash Borer and Insectivorous Insects Essays the paper, so I won't lose them? I'll try to comment on them as I do on the paper itself. My grading criteria follow this definition of the assignment. Any specific grading criteria that I will use for papers will be written in of allegiance in schools the syllabus or announced in class. In general I will look for: a sharp question your interpretation of the author's answer and its supporting argument conscientious use of the Essay Terri and Euthanasia text to support your interpretation your evaluative comments on the adequacy of the author's position explicit, persuasive argument to support your evaluative comments clear, precise writing depth over breadth in analysis respect for the complexity of the text, problem and/or position, and careful proofreading.
Please take these criteria seriously; I do. Papers that take on more difficult questions will be graded with loving kindness. Note that these grading criteria do not include spelling, diction, punctuation, grammar, or organization. The reason is not that these are unimportant; on the contrary, they are presupposed. To think that these essentials of good writing count only in Humanities or English classes is a mistake that hinders your growth as a writer.
In grading I do not comment on matters of pledge of allegiance style. But clarity and precision are not merely matters of style. Clear writing reflects clear thinking. (Sometimes clear thinking produces clear writing, and sometimes clear writing produces clear thinking.) An important criterion of clarity is whether a reader who was puzzled by the book you're interpreting would receive concrete help from reading your paper. Write with the attitude of one trying to strippers help a baffled peer from class to understand. Sometimes I will grade your interpretation and evaluation separately, and of allegiance controversy give the simple average of islam these two grades to the paper overall. This kind of differentiated feedback helps you focus on where you need to improve. Pledge Of Allegiance In Schools Controversy. It also helps to emphasize that each of these two tasks is half the paper in weight. If you would like me to give you comments without a grade, I will be happy to brainwash do so. Of Allegiance In Schools. I must grade you for the sake of the college, but I can leave the grade off your paper. I try hard to grade fairly. If you don't understand why I gave you a certain grade, or if you think it was unfair, please come in so we can talk about it.
One of my most painful grading dilemmas is the high-quality essay that does not fulfill the assignment. I've decided to deal with these by praising them, failing them, and requiring rewrites. If you want to unknown meaning change the assignment, talk to pledge controversy me in advance. If you would like more explanation of the assignment, what it is to write a philosophy paper, to strippers bay interpret a text, evaluate a position, imagine and answer an objection, or argue for a conclusion, then see me and we can talk. If you are unsure about the pledge of allegiance controversy wording or focus of your topic-question, its narrowness, difficulty, or importance, or if the connection between the writing assignments and the objectives of the The Schiavo and Euthanasia course is ever unclear, I'd be happy to talk to you in my office.
Indy teacher told students Pledge of Allegiance was…
Expert Essay Writers -
How the Pledge of Allegiance Is Causing…
Nov 12, 2017 Pledge of allegiance in schools controversy, order quality essays -
Pursuing the separation of politics and prosecutions at the Department of Justice. From the 4/23/07 edition of the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. “Cracking down on drugs and pornography was big business in former U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft’s Department of Justice. When federal prosecutors in California passed on pledge of allegiance in schools cases involving glass bongs and hard-core sex movies, Pittsburgh-based U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan swooped in and stole the show. Critics blasted “Operation Pipe Dreams,” calling the nationwide sting on drug paraphernalia trafficking a waste of resources.
Buchanan charged on, though, and in 2003 won a conviction against Tommy Chong — the Los Angeles actor made famous by bay the marijuana-laced “Cheech and Chong” movies. That same year, she charged Extreme Associates and of allegiance in schools controversy the California owners of the porn production company in the first major federal obscenity prosecution in nelsons bay more than a decade. Critics again wailed about resources and of allegiance in schools the government fiddling with constitutional freedoms. The Justice Department and Ashcroft praised both cases. Buchanan was rewarded with a string of lofty posts, one of which — director of the Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys — has landed her at the forefront of a congressional investigation into a group firing of fellow Republican prosecutors. Buchanan will not discuss the unknown meaning firings or the of allegiance controversy House investigation but said the priorities of the Justice Department are those of her office — including pursuing public corruption cases. The Justice Department is reviewing a House Judiciary Committee request to speak to Buchanan and seven other Justice Department officials. Zevenbergen! She has not met with House investigators. Democrats want to pledge of allegiance, find out why the judaism christianity Bush administration sacked eight of the pledge in schools country’s 93 federal prosecutors. Democrats say they believe some U.S. attorneys were fired to interfere with public corruption cases in ways that might help Republicans.
The House Judiciary Committee has evidence that D. Kyle Sampson, former chief of staff to Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez, consulted Buchanan as head of the Executive Office U.S. attorneys in 2004 and 2005 about whom to fire. Heading the office was largely administrative and dull until 9/11, when the Justice Department began to use it to control U.S. attorneys, said Fred Thieman, a former U.S. attorney in Pittsburgh under President Clinton. “I can’t understand why someone would want that position, unless there was some other purpose,” Thieman said. Buchanan said she works hard and with determination, finding it an honor to serve President Bush and the Justice Department in whatever role necessary. Those who know Buchanan said she is a hard worker and does what’s needed to please her bosses. “They ask, and she responds,” said Roscoe Howard Jr., former U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia. “Certainly, the objective evidence is that they like her.” H.E. “Bud” Cummins, former U.S. attorney for eastern Arkansas and one of the eight forced to step down, said he likes and The Schiavo Case and Euthanasia respects Buchanan. If she participated in pledge the dismissals, though, she failed her colleagues by unknown meaning participating “in the completely ridiculous process of making a list of names” of people to be fired, he said. Thomas J. Farrell, a former assistant U.S. Pledge Of Allegiance In Schools Controversy! attorney in Pittsburgh and frequent Buchanan critic, called Buchanan’s response to the House inquiry a litmus test for her. “I hope she stands up for the integrity and competence of those U.S. attorneys who were fired,” he said. Buchanan was appointed U.S. attorney for Western Pennsylvania by President Bush in watching wife fucked September 2001.
Her office has opened at least five investigations into prominent Democrats over of allegiance in schools controversy, the past five years. Critics say she has ignored allegations against fellow Republicans during that time. “It has been and remains the practice of brainwash my office to investigate and prosecute individuals who violate federal law without regard to their political affiliation,” Buchanan said. Buchanan said all investigations and prosecutions are analyzed from a legal, not partisan, perspective. She has prosecuted former Allegheny County Sheriff Pete DeFazio and aides in his office and former Allegheny County Judge Joseph Jaffe. An investigation of of allegiance in schools former Pittsburgh Mayor Tom Murphy ended without charges being filed.
“There’s no greater adherent to islam judaism, using public corruption charges against the other party than Mary Beth Buchanan,” said Jerry McDevitt, a defense lawyer representing Dr. Cyril H. Wecht, a Democrat, against of allegiance in schools charges he abused his former public office as Allegheny County coroner for strippers nelsons bay private financial gain. Allegations of improper use of office staff have been leveled against two Republican politicians in her jurisdiction, U.S. Of Allegiance Controversy! Rep. Tim Murphy and former state Rep. Jeff Habay. Habay was prosecuted in Allegheny County Court. No federal charges have been filed against these men, but federal authorities are prohibited from saying whether either is being investigated. “ Silence of the lamb, Alberto Gonzales. What Gonzales isn’t saying is as important as what he claims he cannot recall.
His lack of recollection gives the appearance that he’s trying to keep Karl Rove out of the spotlight. Gonzales continues his shellgame; claims he did “nothing improper” By Alberto R. Gonzales. Sunday, April 15, 2007; B07. My decision some months ago to privately seek the resignations of a small number of U.S. attorneys has erupted into a public firestorm.
First and foremost, I appreciate the public service of these fine lawyers and dedicated professionals, each of Emerald and Insectivorous whom served his or her full four-year term as U.S. attorney. I apologize to them, their families and the thousands of dedicated professionals at the Justice Department for my role in in schools allowing this matter to strippers, spin into of allegiance controversy an undignified Washington spectacle. What began as a well-intentioned management effort to identify where, among the 93 U.S. attorneys, changes in leadership might benefit the department, and therefore the islam christianity American people, has become an unintended public controversy. While I accept responsibility for my role in commissioning this management review process, I want to make some fundamental points abundantly clear. I know that I did not — and would not — ask for the resignation of any U.S. Of Allegiance In Schools Controversy! attorney for an improper reason. Furthermore, I have no basis to believe that anyone involved in this process sought the removal of watching wife being a U.S. Pledge Of Allegiance In Schools Controversy! attorney for unknown meaning an improper reason. Given my convictions on this issue, I testified before Congress in January and will do so again on Tuesday. I have personally spoken with many members of Congress over pledge in schools, the past several weeks to hear their concerns about this matter. Additionally, I have instructed all Justice Department officials to unknown meaning, make themselves available for on-the-record interviews with lawmakers and hearings before Congress, and I have ordered the release of thousands of pages of internal documents.
All of these documents and public testimony indicate that the pledge of allegiance in schools Justice Department did not seek the removal of any U.S. Watching Wife Being! attorney to interfere with or improperly influence any case or investigation. Indeed, I am extremely proud of the department’s strong record of vigorous prosecutions, particularly in the area of pledge in schools controversy public corruption, where Republicans and Democrats alike have been held accountable for their crimes. I have nevertheless asked the Justice Department’s Office of Professional Responsibility to further investigate this matter. Working with the department’s Office of Inspector General, these nonpartisan professionals will complete their own independent investigation so that Congress and the American people can be 100 percent assured of what I believe and what the investigation thus far has shown: that nothing improper occurred. While I have never sought to deceive Congress or the American people, I also know that I created confusion with some of my recent statements about islam judaism my role in this matter. To be clear: I directed my then-deputy chief of staff, Kyle Sampson, to of allegiance controversy, initiate this process; fully knew that it was occurring; and approved the final recommendations. Sampson periodically updated me on the review.
As I recall, his updates were brief, relatively few in number and focused primarily on the review process. During those conversations, to my knowledge, I did not make decisions about who should or should not be asked to resign. I am committed to explaining my role in this process and will do so Tuesday when I testify before Congress. I am also committed to correcting any management missteps that occurred during this process. In recent weeks I have met with more than 70 U.S. attorneys around the nelsons country to pledge in schools, hear their concerns and discuss ways to improve communication and coordination between their offices and the Justice Department. These discussions have been frank, and good ideas are coming out, including ways to brainwash zevenbergen, ensure that every U.S. attorney can know whether his or her performance is at the level expected by the president and the attorney general. Pledge! Additionally, I have asked for recommendations on formal and Essay The Terri Schiavo Case and Euthanasia informal steps that we can take to improve all forms of dialogue between the main Justice Department and U.S. attorneys nationwide. I am also telling our 93 U.S. attorneys that I look forward to working with them to pursue the great goals of our department in the weeks and months to come.
During the past two years, we have made great strides in securing our country from terrorism, protecting our neighborhoods from gangs and drugs, shielding our children from predators and pedophiles, and protecting the public trust by prosecuting public corruption. Of Allegiance In Schools Controversy! As I have stressed repeatedly to our U.S. Ash Borer And Insectivorous Insects Essays! attorneys and others within the department, recent events will not and must not deter us from of allegiance controversy, our important mission. In part because of my own experience, I know the Insects Essays real strength of in schools controversy America. It lies in our Constitution, our people and islam christianity our collective unyielding commitment to equal opportunity, equal justice, common decency and fairness. With this same commitment in my mind, I very much look forward to answering Congress’s questions about this matter on Tuesday. ED.: Dear Mr. Gonzales – we, the people of America, hope (and pray) you will do the right thing by either testifying without the slightest hint of obfuscation or lies, or, in pledge the alternative, submitting your resignation forthwith. You are not the right man to run the Department of Justice. Resign, sir, and allow this country to move beyond your own poor job performance and the controversy you, Pete Domenici, Karl Rove, Harriet Miers, Monica Goodling and Heather Wilson created. Further, I would ask that you submit a public apology for unknown meaning the sin you have committed against 8 very good former U.S.
Attorneys. Please don’t let the door hit you where the good Lord split you as you exit the of allegiance in schools controversy building. Battle contradicts Gonzales’ Statements on Firings. By Dan Eggen and Paul Kane, Washington Post Staff Writers. Monday, April 16, 2007; A04. The former Justice Department official who carried out the watching firings of pledge in schools controversy eight U.S. attorneys last year told Congress that several of the prosecutors had no performance problems and that a memo on watching being fucked the firings was distributed at a Nov. 27 meeting attended by pledge of allegiance Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, a Democratic senator said yesterday. The statements to brainwash zevenbergen, House and Senate investigators by Michael A. Battle, former director of the Executive Office for in schools U.S.
Attorneys, represent another potential challenge to the credibility of Gonzales, who has said that he never saw any documents about the firings and that he had “lost confidence” in the prosecutors because of about Schiavo and Euthanasia performance problems. Battle’s statements, relayed to pledge controversy, reporters yesterday by Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), came as Gonzales prepares for unknown meaning a make-or-break appearance on Tuesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Prepared testimony released yesterday indicates Gonzales will apologize to in schools controversy, the fired prosecutors for the way they were treated and will acknowledge that he has been “less than precise” in describing his role in the firings. But Gonzales will also hold firm to his contentions that any missteps were “honest mistakes,” that “nothing improper” took place, and that most of the details were handled by his then-chief of staff, D. Kyle Sampson, according to the testimony. “I have nothing to hide and . . . I am committed to assuring the Congress and the American public that nothing improper occurred here,” Gonzales says in his remarks. “I made mistakes in islam judaism not ensuring that these U.S. attorneys received more dignified treatment,” he adds later. “Others within the Department of Justice also made mistakes.
As far as I know, these were honest mistakes of perception and judgment and controversy not intentional acts of misconduct.” Seven U.S. attorneys were fired on Dec. 7, and Ash Borer another was dismissed earlier, as part of pledge of allegiance controversy a plan that originated in the White House to replace some prosecutors based in part on their perceived disloyalty to President Bush and his policies. The uproar over the removals has grown amid allegations that some Republican lawmakers improperly contacted prosecutors about zevenbergen investigations and repeated misstatements by Gonzales and other Bush administration officials about the scope and nature of the dismissals. Democrats have also seized on pledge of allegiance presidential senior adviser Karl Rove’s connection to some of the firings, and on revelations last week that the fucked White House and the Republican National Committee have lost e-mails that are supposed to be preserved under record-keeping laws. Gonzales and his deputy, Paul J. McNulty, initially told Congress that the firings were due to “performance-related” problems. Subsequent e-mails and pledge other documents released by Justice showed that most had positive job reviews, that they and other U.S. Essay The Terri Schiavo Case And Euthanasia! attorneys were ranked on in schools controversy whether they were “loyal Bushies,” and that Gonzales was more deeply involved in the process than he has sometimes acknowledged.
The statements by Battle, who left his job last month, are the Essay about The Terri first details to emerge from more than 20 hours of interviews with four top Gonzales aides over the past two weeks by staff members on the House and Senate Judiciary committees. The last of those interviews was conducted yesterday with Sampson, who testified publicly last month that he was only an “aggregator” of information on the firings and that ultimate responsibility rested with Gonzales. Battle told investigators that he was “not aware of performance problems with respect to several” of the prosecutors when he called to fire them, Schumer said in a conference call with reporters yesterday. Schumer said Battle also contradicted Gonzales’s assertion at a March 13 news conference that he had not seen any documents or participated in in schools controversy any discussions about the firings. A memo related to the dismissals was passed out at a Nov. 27 meeting attended by Gonzales and others, Battle told investigators.
“Mike Battle remembers a memo was distributed,” Schumer said. In his prepared remarks for Tuesday, Gonzales says “my statement about ‘discussions’ was imprecise and overbroad, but it certainly was not in Emerald Insects Essays any way an attempt to mislead the American people.” Gonzales also addresses new documents released Friday showing that Sampson had identified five potential replacement prosecutors in early 2006, which appeared to contradict testimony from Sampson and repeated statements from Justice officials that no such list had been drawn up. Gonzales will testify that he remembers being told about two possible replacements, but that neither was approved and no one was lined up when the last seven firings were carried out. Schumer and Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.), chairman of the Senate Judiciary panel, immediately criticized Gonzales’s planned testimony as falling short of answering key questions about the firings. “The attorney general has offered another in a series of contradictory statements about the pledge mass firing of U.S. attorneys,” Leahy said. “It has been impossible to discern the truth in this matter based on the shifting explanations and changing stories coming out of the Justice Department and White House.” Sen.
Arlen Specter (Pa.), the committee’s ranking Republican, also said Gonzales should consider reinstating the fired U.S. attorneys. Specter and fellow Republican Lindsey O. Judaism Christianity! Graham (S.C.) said Gonzales has an “uphill” climb to restore his credibility with Congress. Numerous Democrats and pledge of allegiance in schools controversy some Republicans have called on Gonzales to Emerald Ash Borer, resign. “He needs to explain what he did and why he did it,” Graham said yesterday on “Fox News Sunday.” “There are three or four different versions of his role in this, and he needs to of allegiance in schools controversy, bring clarity to what he did and why he did it.” In a related matter yesterday, an attorney for watching being fucked Sen. Pete V. Domenici (R-N.M.), who faces an ethics inquiry into his role in pledge controversy the firings, declined to watching wife, comment on an Albuquerque Journal report that Domenici directly contacted Rove to pledge in schools, push for the firing of David C. Brainwash Zevenbergen! Iglesias as New Mexico’s U.S. attorney. The report said Domenici’s call to of allegiance controversy, the White House came after a late October phone conversation with Iglesias about a local corruption case.
Iglesias has testified he felt the call amounted to watching wife fucked, improper political pressure and believes it lies at of allegiance controversy, the heart of bay his firing. Domenici has acknowledged that he complained to Gonzales and in schools McNulty about strippers bay Iglesias, and has said he told the Justice Department he wanted Iglesias replaced “some months” before the call. But he has never acknowledged calling the White House about the issue. Thousands of pages of pledge of allegiance in schools documents released by brainwash Justice have yet to explain the rationale for of allegiance in schools Iglesias’s firing. In his testimony last month, Sampson could not recall why Iglesias was put on the list, which did not happen until Nov. 7, less than two weeks after Domenici’s call to Iglesias. The e-mails: Gonzales caught in a lie? Gonzales aide floated replacements early on. E-Mails appear to contradict DOJ statements on genesis of attorney firings. WASHINGTON – The attorney general’s former top aide identified five Bush administration insiders as potential replacements for sitting U.S. Brainwash Zevenbergen! attorneys months before those prosecutors were fired, contrary to repeated suggestions from the Justice Department that no such list had been drawn up, according to documents released yesterday. E-mails sent to pledge of allegiance in schools controversy, the White House in brainwash zevenbergen January and May of 2006 by D. Kyle Sampson, then chief of staff to Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, name potential replacements for in schools U.S. attorneys in San Diego, San Francisco, Little Rock and Grand Rapids.
The disclosures contrast with previous statements from Sampson and Essay about The Case and Euthanasia other Justice officials. They have said that only Tim Griffin, a former aide to presidential adviser Karl Rove who was later appointed the pledge of allegiance top federal prosecutor in Little Rock, had been identified as a replacement candidate before the dismissals of the sitting U.S. attorneys. “These documents uncover one of the islam christianity most central and disconcerting contradictions we’ve seen so far,” said Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.). Pledge In Schools Controversy! “We have been told that there were no backups in mind to replace the fired U.S. Zevenbergen! attorneys, and these documents make it clear that there were.” Sampson’s attorney and a Justice spokesman said yesterday that the candidates listed were only pledge in schools tentative suggestions and were never seriously considered. Justice Department spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said the list “reflects Kyle Sampson’s initial thoughts” and “in no way contradicts the department’s prior statements” about the lack of a candidate list. Sampson told the Senate Judiciary Committee last month that on Dec. 7, when seven U.S. Brainwash Zevenbergen! attorneys were sacked, “I did not have in mind any replacements for in schools any of the judaism christianity seven who were asked to resign.” The names of the potential replacements were part of nearly 2,400 pages of documents related to the firings released by the Justice Department yesterday.
They include more complete versions of pledge in schools e-mails and memos previously released. The documents provide new details about a range of topics, including the Terri Schiavo and Euthanasia Justice Department’s focus on its prosecutors’ conservative political credentials and the evolving justifications for the firings. The release came as Gonzales continued intensive preparations for testimony next Tuesday before the pledge of allegiance controversy Senate Judiciary Committee, where Democrats plan to Emerald Ash Borer, focus on pledge of allegiance in schools controversy the Justice Department’s numerous conflicting statements about the firings and on watching wife being fucked Gonzales’s shifting explanations of his role. A number of Republicans have joined Democrats in demanding that Gonzales resign. Seven U.S. attorneys were fired in pledge of allegiance December, and another was dismissed earlier in 2006, as part of a plan that originated in the White House to replace some prosecutors based in part on their perceived disloyalty to President Bush and his policies. Brainwash! The uproar over the removals has grown amid allegations that some Republican lawmakers improperly contacted prosecutors about investigations and assertions by Democrats that the firings may have been an attempt to disrupt public-corruption probes. The possible replacements listed by Sampson in early 2006 were all high-level administration officials, including two suggestions for San Diego who were later given other U.S. attorney postings: Jeffrey A. Pledge In Schools Controversy! Taylor, now chief prosecutor in strippers nelsons bay the District, and Deborah Rhodes, now the U.S. attorney in Alabama. Both were career prosecutors in San Diego before taking senior Justice jobs.
Other candidates included Rachel L. Brand, head of the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Policy, who was considered to of allegiance controversy, replace western Michigan’s prosecutor, and Daniel Levin, a former senior Justice and christianity White House official who was listed as a San Francisco candidate, the memos show. Sampson, who resigned as Gonzales’s top aide last month, said in prepared Senate testimony last month that “none of the U.S. attorneys was asked to pledge controversy, resign in favor of a particular individual who had already been identified to take the vacant spot,” except for watching wife the prosecutor in Little Rock. Sampson’s attorney, Bradford A. Berenson, said yesterday that “testimony regarding the consideration of pledge of allegiance controversy replacements was entirely accurate” and islam christianity that “Kyle had none in mind” at the time the firings were carried out. “Some names had been tentatively suggested for discussion much earlier in the process, but by the time the decision to ask for the resignations was made, none had been chosen to serve as a replacement,” he said. Roehrkasse said that Brand had expressed interest in becoming the U.S. attorney in Grand Rapids but later decided against it. One document also raises new questions about the firing of pledge prosecutor David C. Iglesias in New Mexico, who has testified that he felt pressured by nelsons Sen. Pete V. Of Allegiance! Domenici (R-N.M.) and Rep. Heather A. Wilson (R-N.M.) to speed up indictments of Democrats before last November’s elections. Two pages of handwritten notes by Monica M. Nelsons! Goodling, until recently Gonzales’s senior counselor, include this criticism of Iglesias: “Domenici says he doesn’t move cases.” The notes are undated but appear amid a set of documents relating to meetings in February of this year. Domenici and Wilson have admitted calling Iglesias but have denied pressuring him. Domenici called Gonzales or his deputy four times to complain about Iglesias, and Gonzales also fielded complaints about him last fall from controversy, Bush and Rove.
The documents show the islam judaism evolution of March 6 testimony from William E. Moschella, the principal associate deputy attorney general, to a House subcommittee. Draft versions written just days before he appeared begin with a declaration that Justice “strongly opposes” efforts to revoke Gonzales’s new authority to pledge of allegiance, appoint interim U.S. Strippers! attorneys without Senate confirmation. The scandal mushroomed in ensuing days, however, and Moschella’s testimony was reshaped as the department backed down on the legislation. The documents also reveal new details about the Justice Department’s efforts to contain the political damage as controversy over the firings grew. On March 5, for example, chief Justice spokeswoman Tasia Scolinos sent an e-mail to White House aides saying that Moschella should focus on admitting mistakes related to in schools, how prosecutors were notified of about their dismissals. “We are trying to in schools, muddy the coverage up a bit by trying to put the focus on the process in which they were told,” Scolinos wrote, adding that “I don’t know if the Senate Dems will let this go until it is all out in the open.” Also released yesterday was a chart given to Ash Borer and Insectivorous Insects Essays, Gonzales in February that noted U.S. attorneys’ political backgrounds and pledge whether they were members of the Federalist Society, a coalition of conservative lawyers and legal scholars with close ties to the Bush administration. Islam Judaism Christianity! It is not clear when the of allegiance chart was compiled, nor is it clear whether the brainwash Federalist Society information is accurate. Another document, compiling internal Justice Department “talking points” about the fired prosecutors, disparages two U.S. attorneys — in pledge identical language — about immigration enforcement. Excerpts from DOJ docs released yesterday:
The Justice Department on Essay Friday released 2,400 documents to congressional panels investigating whether the firings last year of the U.S. attorneys were politically motivated. Kyle Sampson, then-chief of staff to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, wrote an Jan. Of Allegiance In Schools Controversy! 9, 2006, e-mail to then-White House Counsel Harriet Miers suggesting replacements for several U.S. attorneys who would be fired nearly a year later: “PLEASE TREAT THIS AS CONFIDENTIAL. The Terri Schiavo Case! … “Margaret M. Chiara. Replacement candidates: Rachel Brand? “Harry E. ‘Bud’ Cummins III. Pledge In Schools Controversy! Replacement candidates: Tim Griffin?” On March 29, under questioning from Sen.
Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., Sampson said he had no replacements for the fired U.S. attorneys last Dec. Brainwash Zevenbergen! 7, when the first wave of them were fired. “Domenici says he doesn’t move cases.” _ Then-Gonzales counsel Monica Goodling, in pledge controversy undated, handwritten notes apparently setting out brainwash reasons for the dismissals. In New Mexico, U.S. Attorney David Iglesias was fired in part because of criticism by Republican Sen. Pete Domenici. The Bush administration and congressional Republicans conferred closely on how to handle testimony earlier this year from the fired U.S. attorneys and current Justice Department officials: “Crystal and pledge of allegiance in schools Dan Flores just called me. They are all geared up and ready to go after the former USA witnesses coming next week.” _ Feb. 28 e-mail from Acting Assistant Attorney General Richard Hertling to other Justice Department officials, referring to The Schiavo Case, aides to House Judiciary Committee Republicans preparing for testimony by the fired U.S. attorneys.
The White House reached out to of allegiance in schools controversy, Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., to fight off Democratic charges that Griffin was unqualified: “WH political reached out to Sen. Sessions and requested that he ask helpful questions to make clear that Tim Griffin is qualified to serve. “They requested that someone in our (Office of Legislative Affairs) call the senator’s staff and make sure that we take advantage of the offer.” _ Goodling, in a Jan. 17 e-mail to Hertling. She also included talking points on Griffin “as well as a narrative that can be used by watching being staff and his resume.”
Buy Essay Online Help and Buy Professionals Essays -
Pledge of Allegiance Fast Facts - CNN - CNN com
Nov 12, 2017 Pledge of allegiance in schools controversy, order essay writing from our custom essay writing service -
Posted in Business Model versus Business Plan. As we prepared for in schools the new Hacking for fucked Defense class at Stanford, we had to pledge in schools stop and ask ourselves: How do we use the Business Model Canvas if the primary goal is brainwash zevenbergen, not to earn money, but to fulfill a mission? In other words, how can we adapt the Business Model Canvas when the metrics of controversy, success for an organization is not revenue? Alexander Osterwalder and I think we have the answer – the zevenbergen, new Mission Model Canvas. Here are our collective thoughts. The Lean Startup is the way most innovators build startups and innovate inside of existing companies. As a formal method, the Lean Startup consists of three parts: The Business Model Canvas has been a great invention for everyone from startups to large companies. Unlike an org chart, which describes how a company executes to deliver known products to of allegiance known customers, the Business Model Canvas illustrates the search for the unknowns that most new ventures face. The 9 boxes of the canvas let you visualize all the strippers, components needed to turn customer needs/problems into a profitable company.
From Revenue Streams to Mission Achievement. The Business Model Canvas has served all of us well in thinking about building businesses – and therein lies the pledge in schools controversy, problem. In a business the aim is to earn more money than you spend. What if you’re a government or a military organization or part of the intelligence community? In these cases you don’t earn money, but you mobilize resources and a budget to judaism christianity solve a particular problem and create value for a set of pledge controversy, beneficiaries (customers, support organizations, warfighters, Congress, the country, etc.)
For these organizations, the canvas box labeled Revenue Streams doesn’t make sense. In a mission-driven organization such as the defense and intelligence community, there is no revenue to measure . So the first step in building a canvas for mission-driven organizations is to change the Revenue Stream box in the canvas and come up with a counterpart that would provide a measure of success. We’re calling this alternative Mission Achievement . Later in this post I’ll explain how we’ll measure and describe Mission Achievement , but first our Mission Model Canvas needs four more tweaks. Customer Segments is changed to Beneficiaries Cost Structure is changed to Mission Cost/Budget Channel is unknown meaning, changed to Deployment Customer Relationships is changed to Buy-in/Support. The rest of pledge controversy, this blog post explains the how and why of these changes to the canvas. Customer Segments Change to Beneficiaries.
At first glance, when developing a new technology for use in the defense and intelligence community, the customer appears obvious – it’s the ultimate war fighter. Brainwash Zevenbergen? They will articulate pains in terms of size, weight, form fit, complexity and durability. But there are other key players involved. Requirement writers and acquisition folks look at controversy, systems integration across the battlefield system, while contracting officers, yet another segment, will count beans, measure the degree of competition and assess the quality of market research involved. The support organizations need to worry about maintainability of code or hardware. Does legal need to brainwash sign off for cyber operations? So yes, war fighters are one customer segment, but others need to be involved before the war fighter can ever see the in schools, product. So the unknown meaning, first insight is that in the defense and intelligence community mission models are always multi-sided markets with the goal of not just building a great demo but getting the product adopted and deployed.
Second, in the defense and intelligence communities almost all of the mission models look like that of an OEM supplier – meaning there are multiple layers of customers in the value chain. Your product/service is just part of pledge of allegiance in schools controversy, someone else’s larger system. So to watching fucked differentiate “customers” from the standard business model canvas we’ll call all the different customer segments and the layers in the defense and intelligence value chain beneficiaries . The Value Proposition Canvas. Of all the nine boxes of the canvas, two important parts of the model are the relationship between the Value Proposition (what you’re building) and the beneficiaries. These two components of the business model are so important we give them their own name, Product/Market Fit. Because of the complexity of multiple beneficiaries and to get more detail about pledge of allegiance in schools controversy their gains and pains, Osterwalder added an additional canvas called the Value Proposition Canvas.
This functions like a plug-in to Essay about The Terri Schiavo Case and Euthanasia the Mission Model Canvas, zooming in to the value proposition to of allegiance describe the interactions among these beneficiaries, war fighters, etc. and the product/service in Essay Terri Schiavo Case and Euthanasia more detail. Pledge In Schools? Using the Value Proposition Canvas with the Mission Model Canvas lets you see both the big picture at the mission model level and the detailed picture of each beneficiary at the “product/market fit” level. In the defense and intelligence community mission models, there will always be multiple beneficiaries. Essay About Terri Schiavo Case? It’s important that each beneficiary gets its own separate Value Proposition Canvas . Distribution Channel changes to pledge of allegiance in schools Deployment. In the strippers nelsons, commercial world we ask, “What type of distribution channel (direct sales, app store, system integrator, etc.) do we use to get the controversy, product/service from our company to the customer segments?” For the brainwash, Department of Defense or Intelligence organizations, we ask instead:
“What will it take to deploy the of allegiance controversy, product/service from islam judaism christianity, our current Minimum Viable Product to widespread use among people who need it?” (What architecture components can they innovate on and what can’t they?) “What constitutes a successful deployment? (number of of allegiance in schools controversy, users, units in the field, time to about The Case get it into the field, success in the field, etc.)” “How do we turn a Horizon 3 innovation into something that gets adopted by a Horizon 1 organization?” Customer Relationships changes to Buy-In/Support. In an existing business, Customer Relationships is pledge of allegiance in schools, defined as establishing and maintaining a relationship to support existing customers. In a startup we redefined Customer Relationships to answer the question: How does a company get, keep and grow customers? For the defense and intelligence communities, we have modified Customer Relationships to mean, “For each beneficiary (customer segment), how does the team get “Buy-In” from all the beneficiaries?” Customer discovery helps you understand whose buy-in is needed in fucked order to of allegiance deploy the about Terri Schiavo, product/service (legal, policy, procurement, etc.) and how to get those beneficiaries to pledge of allegiance controversy buy-in? (Funding?
Mandates? User requested? etc.) In addition, the long-term support and maintenance of new projects need to nelsons bay be articulated, understood and pledge in schools controversy bought-into by the support organizations. At the Pentagon a favorite way to judaism christianity kill something is to coordinate it to death by pledge requiring buy-in from too many people too early. How to determine who are the small group of critical people to get buy-in from unknown meaning, – and how to determine who are the next set required to sustain the iterative development of future MVP’s – is one of the arts of entrepreneurship in the defense and intelligence community. Revenue Streams changes to Mission Achievement. Mission Achievement is the value you are creating for the sum of pledge, all of the beneficiaries / the greater good. It’s important to distinguish between the value for individual beneficiaries (on the Value Proposition Canvas) and overall Mission Achievement . For example, Mission Achievement could be measured in a variety of ways: the number of refugees housed and fed, the brainwash, number of in schools, soldiers saved from roadside bombs, the number of cyberattacks prevented, the increased target surveillance of sensor fusion, etc. Brainwash Zevenbergen? None of these are measured in dollars and cents. Controversy? Keep in being fucked mind, there is only mission achievement if it delivers value to the end beneficiary.
In the defense and pledge of allegiance in schools intelligence community the metrics of success are not revenue but mission achievement We’ve modified the Business Model Canvas into a Mission Model Canvas Changed Revenue Streams to Mission Achievement Changed Customer Segments to Beneficiaries Changed Cost Structure to zevenbergen Mission Cost/Budget Changed Channel to pledge in schools controversy Deployment Changed Customer Relationships to Buy-in/Support Organizations without specific revenue goals can now use a version of the Emerald Insects Essays, Business Model Canvas. Why Build, Measure, Learn – isn’t just throwing things against the wall to see if they work – the Minimal Viable Product. I am always surprised when critics complain that the Lean Startup’s Build, Measure, Learn approach is nothing more than “throwing incomplete products out of the pledge of allegiance in schools controversy, building to see if they work.” Unfortunately the Build, Measure, Learn diagram is the cause of that confusion. At first glance it seems like a fire-ready-aim process.
It’s time to update Build, Measure, Learn to what we now know is the best way to build Lean startups. Build, Measure, Learn sounds pretty simple. Build a product, get it into the real world, measure customers’ reactions and behaviors, learn from this, and Essay about The Terri Schiavo use what you’ve learned to build something better. Repeat, learning whether to iterate, pivot or restart until you have something that customers love. While it sounds simple , the Build Measure Learn approach to product development is a radical improvement over the traditional Waterfall model used throughout the in schools, 20 th century to wife being build and ship products. Back then, an in schools controversy, entrepreneur used a serial product development process that proceeded step-by-step with little if any customer feedback. Founders assumed they understood customer problems/needs, wrote engineering requirements documents, designed the product, implemented /built the hardware/software, verified that it worked by testing it, and then introduced the product to customers in a formal coming out called first customer ship . Waterfall Development was all about execution of the judaism, requirements document. While early versions of the product were shared with customers in Alpha and Beta Testing, the of allegiance controversy, goal of early customer access to the product was to uncover bugs not to provide feedback on islam judaism christianity features or usability. Only after shipping and attempting to sell the pledge, product would a startup hear any substantive feedback from customers. And too often, after months or even years of development, entrepreneurs learned the hard way that customers were not buying their product because they did not need or want most of its features.
It often took companies three tries to get products right. Version 1 was built without customer feedback, and before version 1 was complete work had already started on about Terri Schiavo Case and Euthanasia version 2 so it took till version 3 before the customer was really heard (e.g. Pledge In Schools? Microsoft Windows 3.0) Best practices in software development started to move to agile development in the early 2000’s. This methodology improved on waterfall by building software iteratively and involving the customer.
But it lacked a framework for unknown meaning testing all commercialization hypotheses outside of the building. With Agile you could end up satisfying every feature a customer asked for and still go out of business. Then came the Build-Measure-learn focus of the Lean Startup. The goal of Build-Measure-Learn is not to of allegiance controversy build a final product to ship or even to build a prototype of a product, but to maximize learning through incremental and iterative engineering. Judaism Christianity? (Learning could be about product features, customer needs, the right pricing and distribution channel, etc.) The “build” step refers to in schools building a minimal viable product (an MVP.) It’s critical to islam judaism christianity understand that an MVP is not the product with fewer features. Rather it is the of allegiance, simplest thing that you can show to customers to The Terri get the most learning at that point in time . Early on in a startup, an MVP could simply be a PowerPoint slide, wireframe, clay model, sample data set, etc. Each time you build an MVP you also define what you are trying to test/ measure . Later, as more is learned, the MVP’s go from low-fidelity to higher fidelity, but the pledge of allegiance in schools, goal continues to be to maximize learning not to build a beta/fully featured prototype of the product. A major improvement over wife being fucked, Waterfall development, Build Measure Learn lets startups be fast, agile and efficient. The three-circle diagram of Build Measure Learn is good approximation of the process. Unfortunately, using the word “build” first often confuses people. Controversy? The diagram does seem to imply build stuff and throw it out of the Essay Schiavo Case, building. A more detailed version of the Build Measure Learn diagram helps to clarify the meaning by adding three more elements: Ideas -Build- Code -Measure- Data -Learn.
The five-part version of the Build Measure Learn diagram helps us see that the real intent of building is to test “ideas” – not just to pledge in schools controversy build blindly without an objective. The circle labeled “code” could easily be labeled “build hardware” or “build artificial genome.” The circle labeled “data” indicates that after we measure our experiments we’ll use the data to further refine our learning. And the new learning will influence our next ideas. So we can see that the goal of Build-Measure-Learn isn’t just to build things, the goal is to build things to nelsons validate or invalidate the initial idea. The focus on testing specific ideas counters the pledge controversy, concern that build-measure-learn is just throwing things against the wall and see if they work. But it’s still not good enough. We can now do better. Start With Hypotheses.
What Build-Measure-Learn misses is brainwash, that new ventures (both startups and new ideas in pledge of allegiance existing companies) don’t start with “ideas”, they start with hypotheses (a fancy word for guesses.) It’s important to understand that the words “idea ” and “hypotheses” mean two very different things. For most innovators the word “idea” conjures up an insight that immediately requires a plan to bring it to fruition. In contrast, a hypothesis means we have an educated guess that requires experimentation and data to validate or invalidate . These hypotheses span the gamut from who’s the Essay The Terri Schiavo, customer(s), to what’s the value proposition (product/service features), pricing, distribution channel, and demand creation (customer acquisition, activation, retention, etc.) That the Lean Startup begins with acknowledging that your idea is pledge in schools controversy, simply a series of untested hypotheses is a big idea. It’s a really big idea because what you build needs to match the hypothesis you want to test . The minimum viable product you’ll need to Emerald Ash Borer Insects Essays build to find the right customers is different from the minimum viable product you need for testing pricing, which is different from an MVP you would build to test specific product features. And all of pledge controversy, these hypotheses (and minimal viable products) change over time as you learn more.
So instead of Build-Measure-Learn, the diagram for building minimal viable products in a Lean Startup looks like Hypotheses – Experiments – Tests – Insights. Using this new Hypotheses – Experiments – Tests – Insights diagram the brainwash zevenbergen, question then becomes, “What hypotheses should I test?” Luckily Alexander Osterwalder’s business model canvas presents a visual overview of the controversy, nine components of a business on one page. They are: value proposition, product/service the company offers (along with its benefits to customers) customer segments, such as users and nelsons bay payers or moms or teens distribution channels to reach customers and offer them the value proposition customer relationships to create demand revenue streams generated by the value proposition(s) activities necessary to implement the business model resources needed to make the activities possible partners 3 rd parties needed to make the activities possible cost structure resulting from the pledge of allegiance, business model. And it brings us to the definition of a startup: A startup is a temporary organization designed to search for a repeatable and scalable business model . And once these hypotheses fill the Business Model Canvas, how does an entrepreneur go about unknown meaning testing them? If you’re a scientist the answer is of allegiance in schools, easy: you run experiments. The same is true in a Lean Startup. (The National Science Foundation described the Lean LaunchPad class as the scientific method for entrepreneurship.) The Customer Development process is a simple methodology for taking new venture hypotheses and getting out of the building to test them. Customer discovery captures the founders’ vision and turns it into about The Schiavo, a series of business model hypotheses.
Then it develops a series of in schools controversy, experiments to test customer reactions to those hypotheses and turn them into islam christianity, facts. The experiments can be a series of questions you ask customers but most often a minimal viable product to help potential customers understand your solution accompanies the questions. So another big idea here is startups are not building minimal viable products to build a prototype. They are building minimal viable products to of allegiance in schools learn the most they can . Finally, the about Case and Euthanasia, goal of designing these experiments and minimal viable products is not to get data . The data is not the endpoint. Pledge Of Allegiance? Anyone can collect data.
Focus groups collect data. This is not a focus group. The goal is to get insight . The entire point of getting out of the building is to inform the unknown meaning, founder’s vision . Pledge? The insight may come from analyzing customer responses, but it also may come from Emerald Ash Borer, ignoring the data or realizing that what you are describing is a new, disruptive market that doesn’t exist, and that you need to change your experiments from measuring specifics to inventing the future. Build, Measure, Learn is a great improvement over Waterfall product development and of allegiance in schools controversy provided the framework to truly join the customer to Essay about Terri Schiavo Case agile development However, emphasizing “Build” or “Ideas” as the pledge, first step misses the key insight about a Lean Startup – you are starting with hypotheses to be tested and wife fucked are searching for repeatable and scalable business model Hypotheses, Experiments, Test, Insights better represents the Lean startup process: Use the Business Model Canvas to frame hypotheses, Customer Development to get out of the building to test hypotheses, and Agile Engineering to pledge of allegiance controversy build the product iteratively and incrementally. Fear of Ash Borer Insects Essays, Failure and Lack of of allegiance in schools, Speed In a Large Corporation. I just spent a day working with Bob, the nelsons bay, Chief Innovation Officer of a very smart large company I’ll call Acme Widgets. Bob summarized Acme’s impediments to innovation. “At our company we have a culture that fears failure. Pledge Of Allegiance In Schools? A failed project is considered a negative to watching wife a corporate career.
As a result, few people want to start a project that might not succeed. In Schools Controversy? And worse, even if someone does manage to nelsons bay start something new, our management structure has so many financial, legal and HR hurdles that every initiative needs to match our existing business financial metrics, processes and procedures. So we end up in “paralysis by analysis” – moving slowly to ensure we don’t make mistakes and that everyone signs off on of allegiance in schools every idea (so we can spread the collective blame if it fails). And when we do make bets, they’re small bets on incremental products or acquisitions that simply add to the bottom line.” Bob looked wistful, “Our founders built a company known for taking risks and moving fast. Now we’re known for “making the numbers,” living on our past successes. More agile competitors are starting to eat into our business. How can we restart our innovation culture?” What Drives Innovation?
I pointed out to Bob the and Euthanasia, irony – in pledge in schools a large company “fear of failure” inhibits speed and risk taking while in a startup “fear of failure” drives speed and urgency. If we could understand the root cause of that difference, I said, we could help Acme build a system for continuous innovation. I suggested the best place to start the conversation is with the 21 st century definition of strippers nelsons, a startup: A startup is a temporary organization designed to search for a repeatable and pledge of allegiance scalable business model. Startups have finite time and resources to find product/market fit before they run out of money. Therefore startups trade off certainty for Ash Borer and Insectivorous Insects Essays speed, adopting “good enough decision making” and iterating and pivoting as they fail, learn, and discover their business model. The corollary for a large company is: A company is a permanent organization designed to execute a repeatable and scalable business model. That means in their core business, large companies have a series of knowns . They’ve found product/market fit (what products customers want to buy). They’ve learned the in schools, best distribution channel to get the product from Ash Borer Insects, their company to the customer. They’ve figured out the revenue model (subscription, license, direct sale, etc.) and pledge how to price the product. They know the activities, resources and partners (manufacturing, regulation, IP, supply chain, etc.) – and the costs to deliver the product/service and have well defined product development and watching being product management tools that emphasize the linear nature of of allegiance, shipping products to existing customers.
There are financial metrics (Return on Investment, Hurdle Rate, etc.) for bay new product development that emphasize immediate returns. Pledge Controversy? And everyone has job titles and job descriptions that describe their role in execution . Why Execution and Innovation Need Different Tools, Cultures and Organizations. Talking to Bob I realized that at Acme Widgets (and in most large companies) the word “failure” was being used to describe two very different events: failure in execution of a known product in known market failure in searching for nelsons innovation when there are many unknowns. Therefore, in a large company, failure to meet a goal – revenue, product delivery, service, etc.– is a failure in execution of an individual and/or organization to of allegiance controversy perform to a known set of success criteria . Strippers? In corporations the of allegiance, penalty for wife repeated failure on known tasks is being reassigned to other tasks or asked to leave the in schools controversy, company. As I sat with Bob and his innovation team, I realized that all of unknown meaning, Acme’s new product innovation initiatives were being held to the same standard as those of existing products . Controversy? Acme was approaching innovation and disruptive product ideas using the same processes, procedures, schedules, and incentives within the same organizational structure and culture as its existing businesses. No wonder innovation at Acme had stalled. The Ambidextrous Organization – Execution and Innovation. That companies should be simultaneously executing and innovating isn’t a new insight. For decades others have observed that companies needed to be ambidextrous. So while we did not lack the zevenbergen, insight that execution and innovation need to of allegiance in schools be separate, we did lack the processes, tools, culture and organizational structures to implement it . Corporate innovation initiatives have spent decades looking at unknown meaning, other corporate structures as models for innovation when in fact we should have been looking at in schools controversy, startups for innovation models – and adapting and adopting them for corporate use.
What We Now Know about Corporate Innovation. In the last five years, as the need for Essay about The Terri Schiavo continuous innovation in of allegiance controversy companies has become critical, Lean innovation methodologies (Lean LaunchPad/I-Corps) have also emerged. These methods allow rapid experimentation – at unknown meaning, startup speed – with the same rigor and discipline as traditional execution processes. Adopted by the National Science Foundation and large companies, over pledge of allegiance, 1000 teams have used the process, and the resulting commercialization success speaks for watching being fucked itself. But running a Lean Startup inside an organization designed for execution is an exercise in futility. Working with large corporations we’ve learned that innovation groups need their own structure, culture, tools (Lean, Design Thinking, etc.), metrics (validated/invalidated hypotheses, Investment Readiness Level) and processes. And both organizations – execution and innovation – need to understand that the success of the company rests on how well they can cooperate. Bob’s eyes lit up as he said, “Now I understand why innovation seemed beyond our reach.
We were missing four ideas: Accepting failure and running at speed are part of an innovation culture. We need to separate out innovation risks from pledge of allegiance in schools controversy, execution risks. There are now proven Lean innovation methodologies (Lean LaunchPad/I-Corps) that we can use off the shelf in building an innovation culture without inventing our own. The Terri Schiavo? We need to make sure that management no longer uses execution metrics to manage and judge our innovation teams. In a startup “fear of failure” drives speed and urgency In a large company “fear of failure” inhibits speed and risk Innovation means experimentation in searching for a business model. Pledge Of Allegiance In Schools? Often failure is the norm not the exception.
Innovation processes and metrics need to be different from those of the execution organizations There are proven Lean innovation methodologies that work in large existing companies. I’m on the Air – On Sirius XM Channel 111. Starting this Monday, March 9 th 4-6pm Pacific Time I’ll be on the radio hosting the Bay Area Ventures program on islam Sirius XM radio Channel 111 – the Wharton Business Radio Channel. Over this program I’ll be talking to controversy entrepreneurs, financial experts and academic leaders in the tech and biotech industries. And if the nelsons bay, past is prologue I guarantee you that this will be radio worth listening to. On our first show, Monday March 9 th 4-6pm Pacific Time join me, as I chat with Alexander Osterwalder – inventor of the controversy, Business Model Canvas, and Oren Jacob, ex-CTO of Pixar and now CEO of Emerald Essays, ToyTalk on pledge Sirius XM Radio Channel 111 . Oren Jacob – CEO ToyTalk. Alex Osterwalder – Business Models. On Monday’s show we’ll be talking about a range of entrepreneurship topics: what’s a Business Model Canvas, how to build startups efficiently, the 9 deadly sins of a startup, the life of a startup CEO, how large companies can innovate at startup speeds. But it won’t just be us talking; we’ll be taking your questions live and on the air by phone, email or Twitter. On April 27 th , on my next program, my guest will be Eric Ries the islam christianity, author of the Lean Startup.
Future guests include Marc Pincus, founder of Zynga, and other interesting founders and investors. Is there anyone you’d like to hear on the air on future shows? Any specific topics you’d like discussed? Leave me a comment. Mark your calendar for 4-6pm Pacific Time on pledge in schools Sirius XM Radio Channel 111 : Blowing up the Essay Terri Schiavo and Euthanasia, Business Plan at U.C. Pledge Of Allegiance In Schools Controversy? Berkeley Haas Business School. During the Cold War with the Soviet Union, science and engineering at bay, both Stanford and U.C. Berkeley were heavily funded to develop Cold War weapon systems. Stanford’s focus was Electronic Intelligence and pledge of allegiance in schools those advanced microwave components and systems were useful in a variety of weapons systems.
Starting in the 1950’s, Stanford’s engineering department became “outward facing” and developed a culture of spinouts and active faculty support and participation in the first wave of Silicon Valley startups. At the about The Schiavo Case, same time Berkeley was also developing Cold War weapons systems. However its focus was nuclear weapons – not something you wanted to pledge controversy be spinning out. So Berkeley started a half century history of “inward facing innovation” focused on watching wife being fucked the Lawrence Livermore nuclear weapons lab. (See the presentation here.) Given its inward focus, Berkeley has always been the neglected sibling in Silicon Valley entrepreneurship. That has changed in the last few years.
Today the U.C. Berkeley Haas Business School is pledge in schools, a leader in entrepreneurship education. It has replaced how to Emerald Ash Borer Insects Essays write a business plan with hands-on Lean Startup methods. It’s teaching the LaunchPad ® and the I-Corps for the National Science Foundation and National Institutes of Health, as well as corporate entrepreneurship courses. Here’s the story from in schools, Andre Marquis, Executive Director of Berkeley’s Lester Center for Entrepreneurship. When I came to U.C. Berkeley in 2010 to run the Lester Center for Entrepreneurship in the Haas School of Business we were teaching entrepreneurship the same way as when I was a student back in 1995. Our core MBA class used the brainwash, seminal textbook New Venture Creation by pledge in schools controversy Jeffrey Timmons of Babson College that was first published in 1977. The final deliverable for that class was a 30-page business plan. We had multiple business plan competitions. As I looked around at other schools, I saw pretty much the same landscape – business plan classes, business plan competitions and loosely coupled accelerators that focused primarily on mentoring.
Over my career as a serial entrepreneur I observed that since the wife being fucked, late 1990s, no early-stage Silicon Valley investor had used business plans to pledge of allegiance controversy screen investments. Even those who asked for them never read them. Ash Borer And Insectivorous Essays? Traction and evidence from controversy, customers were what investors were looking for – even in “slow” sectors like healthcare and energy. There had been tectonic shifts in brainwash zevenbergen the startup world, but our business school curriculum had barely moved. There was a big gap in our educational paradigm. To create great entrepreneurs, we had to give our students the experience of pledge, navigating the chaos and uncertainty of running a lean startup while providing the same kind of rigorous framework the business plan did in its day. The advantage of brainwash zevenbergen, following New Venture Creation is that it had a deep pedagogical infrastructure that students took away after they left school. The disadvantage is that its methodology was based on the old waterfall model of product development and not the of allegiance, agile and lean methods that startups use today. As I began my search to increase the relevance of unknown meaning, our entrepreneurship curriculum with the same rigor as Timmons and of allegiance New Venture Creation, I found the answer right here at Berkeley, in Essay about The and Euthanasia Steve Blank’s Lean LaunchPad class.
(Our founding Executive Director Jerry Engel, recently retired to become dean of faculty for the National Science Foundation I-Corps, had a tradition of incorporating leading practioners, like Steve. These ‘pracademics’ proved to be some of the biggest innovators in entrepreneurship education.) Seeing Is Believing. The Lean LaunchPad class was completely different from a traditional entrepreneurship class. It taught lean theory (business model design, customer development and pledge controversy agile engineering) and practice. Every week, each student team stood in front of the class and presented their business model hypotheses, what they had learned from talking to customers, demo’d their minimal viable products and had to islam explain what they were going to controversy do next. Steve and the venture capitalists at the back of the room relentlessly peppered them with questions and Essay about The Terri Case pushed them to pledge of allegiance in schools controversy get out of the building and call on the real decision-makers instead of talking to people they already knew.
Some teams stepped down from the podium proud that they had made real progress that week while others were chastised because they stuck to their comfort zone, were not doing the tough work required by entrepreneurs and on the road to failure. I realized this class was teaching students exactly what it felt like to be an about The Schiavo and Euthanasia, entrepreneur! Great entrepreneurs are on a search for the truth, no matter how wrong their initial conception is. Pledge Of Allegiance Controversy? Being an entrepreneur is about starting out with no idea whether you are working on the next big thing or something no one wants and certainly no one will pay for. It’s struggling to find the right path forward through chaos and uncertainty. Killing bad ideas quickly and moving on.
Staring at the phone while mentally wrestling to pick it up to make that next cold call. It’s having investors tell you that you’re dead wrong and, perhaps with enough customer traction, showing them the path to a new future neither of you could see at the time. And there it was. The Lean LaunchPad was unlike any class I’d ever seen. As a Silicon Valley entrepreneur I had lived the lean approach, yet I had never seen it taught. Done informally as part of an accelerator, yes, but not with a framework based on a clear process and clear pedagogy. The Lean LaunchPad was teaching students concepts and zevenbergen a process that they took away from the class and could use again for their next startup. I realized I was looking at a paradigm shift in entrepreneurial education – away from the business plan-focused model to a Lean Startup model. (The irony is that once you’ve gone through the lean cycle, you have all the information that goes in a business plan: customers, sales strategy, product features, and financial metrics. It’s just that they are validated instead of made up.) The Business Plan is Dead.
Now, 4 years after I arrived at BerkeleyHaas, we don’t teach business plan writing in any of our entrepreneurship classes or in any of our dozens of programs and competitions. We use Customer Development and pledge in schools the Lean LaunchPad to train and accelerate teams U.C. Berkeley-wide. We’ve gone global as well. In the past year alone, we’ve taught over 250 teams, over 1,000 entrepreneurs and their mentors in dozens of countries how to create scalable startups in nelsons bay domains from pledge of allegiance in schools controversy, software and hardware to healthcare and energy. Haas global footprint. The international teams watch the lectures online, get out of the building, present to us each week via WebEx and get the same brand of relentless and unknown meaning direct feedback their U.C. Berkeley peers got in Steve’s class. For example, our Intel Technology To Market Accelerator took 22 teams from 11 countries across 15 time zones, from northern Russia to southern Chile and from Saudi Arabia to the U.S. (Chicago) through the Lean LaunchPad process. Of Allegiance? Clearly, lean works globally.
And we’ve been part of the U.S. effort to use the Lean LaunchPad to accelerate commercialization for the country’s best research spinouts from the National Science Foundation and National Institutes of Health. Strippers Nelsons? We do this by running classes for the NSF Innovation Corps and The I-Corps at the NIH. And the same lean techniques work just as well in the corporate innovation programs we run such as the Intel Make It Wearable Challenge. An important distinction is that these programs are accelerators. The teams in them start with an pledge of allegiance controversy, idea or product, meet with customers, build prototypes and search for unknown meaning a scalable business model.
All declare their startup a “go” or “no go” at the end. Of Allegiance In Schools Controversy? They learn it’s all about unknown meaning building to scale, pivoting or declaring failure, and moving on using a hypothesis-driven search for the truth. Even our venerable 15-year old business plan competition, once dubbed “bplan,” has transformed into pledge of allegiance in schools controversy, LAUNCH, a multi-month accelerator with a rigorous process combining the Lean LaunchPad, agile product development and a focus on measurable Lean Analytics. Ironically, LAUNCH has turned out to be much more rigorous than the prior business plan competition because we immerse every entrepreneur and their mentors in conquering the chaos and uncertainty that is normal for startups. We expect them to come out with specific knowledge of their markets and business ecosystem, verified metrics, a product and a plan for moving forward based on islam interacting with their actual customers – not honing the teams for a beauty pageant-like pitch fest or making them produce a business plan that’s fundamentally speculative. Pledge In Schools? As educators, we are having a deep impact on these entrepreneurs and their startups. Lean LaunchPad Works Across Industries. I often hear the concern that the Lean LaunchPad only works for judaism software. After 700 teams in robotics, materials, hardware, therapeutics, diagnostics, medical devices, and enterprise software, it’s clear that Lean Startup methods work across all industries.
We’ve taught versions of the Lean LaunchPad for life sciences at UCSF and as part of the National Institutes of Health, for hardware-focused startups making wearable devices as part of the Intel Make It Wearable Challenge, for teams working on nanotechnology and in in schools controversy education (STEMKids and Build and Imagine). Two of our BerkeleyHaas Faculty, Jorge Calderon and nelsons Will Rosenzweig, created a Social Lean LaunchPad class that embraces the mission and stakeholders central to of allegiance in schools controversy social ventures. Whether it’s making iPhone apps or medical devices, every startup is about Terri, looking for a repeatable and scalable business model. Controversy? Focusing on finding customer needs, figuring out wife fucked, how they buy and how to scale up product delivery are universal. Where We Are Going From Here. At U.C. Berkeley we’ve undergone a complete transformation in just four years.
But the longer journey is to pledge in schools controversy continue to build new lean-tools and classes separate from the 40 year-old, business plan-based tradition. We continue to ask ourselves, “What can we do to get our students out brainwash, of the controversy, classroom, in cross-functional teams, building for specific customers and having the experience of making hard decisions under conditions of uncertainty? What can we do to islam christianity expand and deepen the rigor of the pledge controversy, Lean Startup methodologies and fully elaborate our curriculum?” At BerkeleyHaas we are sharing what we are learning (see below). By embracing lean, you can be assured you will be giving your students essential innovation skills they will use for the rest of their lives. You will see great startups focused on solving real customer problems emerge as well. This is an exciting journey and strippers we are all right at the start.
Some resources for shifting the paradigm in your organization: Early-stage investors don’t read business plans We are in the middle of pledge of allegiance, a shift in entrepreneurship education from teaching the islam christianity, waterfall model of startup development (enshrined in business plans) to teaching the lean startup model The Lean LaunchPad process works across a wide range of domains – from science and engineering to healthcare, energy, government, the social sector and for corporate innovation Customer Development works outside Silicon Valley. Pledge Of Allegiance Controversy? In fact, it works globally The Lean LaunchPad is a business process that teaches entrepreneurs and innovators to make business-focused, evidence-based decisions under conditions of chaos and uncertainty. Wife Being Fucked? It’s a big idea.
Order Paper Writing Help 24/7 -
The history of legal challenges to the Pledge of…
Nov 12, 2017 Pledge of allegiance in schools controversy, write my essay online for cheap -
25 Examples of Creative Graphic Design Resumes. We all know how important a resume or CV is when applying for a job. It’s the first thing an employer will judge you on before you even get an interview. Some would even argue that this step is even more important that the actual interview. All designers might have similar skills, but who has more creativity? A designer might be certified in Photoshop, but that does not mean they are creative. Knowing the software inside out is quite handy to speed up your workflow, but what#8217;s the use if you lack the of allegiance in schools right side of the brain ? I know many designers who have no certification but in Essay about The Case return create drool worthy work. This is a common delima in the design field, but most firms/agencies are not blind and pledge of allegiance controversy realize that visual work speaks for itself. A unique resume is islam, important for many reasons.
Not only it does it resemble your personality, but it also speaks your capability and pledge of allegiance creativity. Putting more effort and thoughts into The Terri Schiavo Case and Euthanasia creating an impressive resume is definitely worthwhile, as it is usually the first thing any employer sees before flipping through your entire portfolio. We are here to help you gain inspiration for controversy this challenging task. So dust off your resume and give it a face-lift! Print your CV/resume onto high quality paper or card. Why? Because when someone gets a hold of it, they will feel like it needs to be taken care of and not just shoved to the side into a pile. Prior to sending out your resume be sure to have your resume professionally edited. It’s amazing how well a resume can read when “touched” by a professional editor. Use beautiful typography, everybody has the same fonts on their computer. Feel free to check out zevenbergen, our font collections . Some web designers take things a step further and create a resume based website to showoff their skills.
We have gained much feedback regarding this controversial topic, ever since our last article over a year ago. Check out some previous comments regarding this matter, some are positive and some negative: #8220;These are all really, really bad as resumes, and of allegiance a lot of them are bad from a graphic design point of view. Don’t encourage people to turn in judaism christianity resumes like this.#8221; Anonymous. #8220;It would be much better if resume’s were always in this format. In Schools Controversy. You would see the islam creativity in pledge of allegiance controversy every person.#8221; Fajas Colombianas. #8220;I am very much grateful to you for posting such an innovative concept of creative resume. This stuff is really helpful.#8221; Shawn. Brainwash Zevenbergen. #8220;These CV’s would end up in the bin to most employers. A CV should be clear and concise, not a piece of artwork.
You can show off your work at pledge in schools the interview stages. Zevenbergen. Employers have 3-5 secs attention span when looking at CVs. Of Allegiance In Schools Controversy. If yours is complicated to read then it will be discarded and the person below may get the interview.#8221; Neil. #8220;Infographics are visually mentally stimulating. Thanks for sharing!#8221; Creative Pile. Please remember this obvious fact: These are NOT great examples for everyone looking for a normal job, it is about getting a creative position. Note: All images are linked to their source. Personal Resume by Marco Schifano. Infographic resume by Hee Sun Kim. I'm a digital nomad and entrepreneur bouncing around South East Asia.
When I'm not working here, I'm out being fucked, taking photos. Follow me on Instagram: @igorovsyannykov. In Schools Controversy. Hi there Igor, I#8217;m Diego, the founder of cvgram.me. Thank you for sharing all these infographics, they look really awesome. If you have any questions about cvgram, just shoot me an email. Diego. Amazing things here. Zevenbergen. I am very satisfied to look your article. Thanks a lot and I#8217;m having a look ahead to touch you.
Will you please drop me a mail? Loved the of allegiance infographic resumes!! Igor your examples of creative graphic designing resumes are awesome i love that. Alot of these would be tossed out in the states #8212; they have the person#8217;s age on them. When applying for jobs at companies here you can#8217;t put ages or pictures on your application data.
Companies are not allowed to use that data (for the most part) for fear of agism lawsuits. Emerald And Insectivorous Insects Essays. In fact, many have internal regulations that require such information be discardedkind of trashing the whole point of sending in pledge of allegiance controversy a resume. Watching Wife Being Fucked. Resently I have designed inovative form of Info graphic 3d paper crafted resume which u can see in my this link http://www.behance.net/gallery/Info-graphic-3d-Paper-Resume/4691783. These are pretty amazing, and of allegiance in schools controversy they inspired me to The Terri Schiavo, re-hash my own with a laboratory notebook feel to pledge controversy, it: http://www.flickr.com/photos/gemmerich/7722386732/ I love the creativity and the relevance of each person resume that ties into their personal DNA. I love the creativity and the relevance of each person resume that ties into their personal DNA. I love the creativity and the relevance of judaism christianity each person resume that ties into their personal DNA. Controversy. I love the creativity and the relevance of each person resume that ties into their personal DNA. Unknown Meaning. I love the creativity and the relevance of each person resume that ties into in schools controversy their personal DNA.
I love the creativity and the relevance of each person resume that ties into Essay about Terri Schiavo their personal DNA. I love the creativity and of allegiance controversy the relevance of each person resume that ties into their personal DNA. I love the creativity and the relevance of watching wife being fucked each person resume that ties into their personal DNA. Controversy. I love the about Terri Schiavo Case creativity and the relevance of each person resume that ties into their personal DNA. I love the of allegiance creativity and the relevance of Essay Schiavo each person resume that ties into their personal DNA. I love the creativity and the relevance of each person resume that ties into their personal DNA. I love the creativity and in schools controversy the relevance of and Insectivorous each person resume that ties into their personal DNA. I really hope that the content in these resumes is fake.
Nobody should take this seriously, as nobody in of allegiance controversy the #8216;real world#8217; would get hired if they turned in any of these resumes. A rookie might easily fall in love with this, but be careful. Most resumes are filtered through a database which searches for specific keywords#8230; Also, a lot of space is dedicated to graphics rather than to a specific job for which resumes should be written for. Bay. I urge people that they meet with hiring professionals, if possible, and ask for resume reviews#8230; Do yourself a favor and get Knock #8216;Em Dead Resumes and Knock #8216;Em Dead Cover Letters#8230; These books are amazing. Also, keep in of allegiance in schools controversy mind that it#8217;s most likely not a creative person who is pulling your resume out of a database. It#8217;s someone in HR who knows very little about design#8230; The person who looked at my resume, at a magazine place, was awfully boring, spending her days in a plain HR office, working on her PC. My goal was to get the resume through her so that I can impress the strippers nelsons creative team#8230;And always be honest. Controversy. That#8217;s the key. Depends, of course, on who#8217;s looking at the resume.
I own a media agency and would expect to see (or at least like to bay, see) a presentation of this sort from a graphic designer#8230; And I am shopping for one. Pledge. Also, it depends on brainwash zevenbergen the market as well. In larger markets, where creatives tend to be in greater demand, companies seeking graphic designers get 50-100 resumes a day on their desks. Again, resumes like those above really make a statement. To your point, a happy medium would dictate that the job seeker have both traditional and contemporary versions. Depends, of of allegiance in schools course, on who#8217;s looking at the resume. I own a media agency and would expect to see (or at nelsons least like to see) a presentation of this sort from of allegiance, a graphic designer#8230; And I am shopping for one. Also, it depends on the market as well. In larger markets, where creatives tend to be in greater demand, companies seeking graphic designers get 50-100 resumes a day on their desks.
Again, resumes like those above really make a statement. To your point, a happy medium would dictate that the job seeker have both traditional and contemporary versions. Depends, of course, on who#8217;s looking at the resume. I own a media agency and would expect to brainwash zevenbergen, see (or at of allegiance controversy least like to see) a presentation of this sort from a graphic designer#8230; And I am shopping for one. Also, it depends on the market as well. Unknown Meaning. In larger markets, where creatives tend to be in pledge of allegiance in schools controversy greater demand, companies seeking graphic designers get 50-100 resumes a day on their desks. Again, resumes like those above really make a statement. To your point, a happy medium would dictate that the job seeker have both traditional and watching being fucked contemporary versions. Pledge Controversy. Depends, of course, on who#8217;s looking at the resume.
I own a media agency and would expect to see (or at least like to see) a presentation of nelsons bay this sort from a graphic designer#8230; And I am shopping for one. Also, it depends on the market as well. In larger markets, where creatives tend to be in greater demand, companies seeking graphic designers get 50-100 resumes a day on their desks. Again, resumes like those above really make a statement. To your point, a happy medium would dictate that the job seeker have both traditional and contemporary versions. Depends, of course, on who#8217;s looking at the resume. I own a media agency and would expect to see (or at least like to see) a presentation of this sort from a graphic designer#8230; And I am shopping for one.
Also, it depends on the market as well. In larger markets, where creatives tend to be in greater demand, companies seeking graphic designers get 50-100 resumes a day on their desks. Again, resumes like those above really make a statement. Controversy. To your point, a happy medium would dictate that the job seeker have both traditional and contemporary versions. Depends, of course, on who#8217;s looking at the resume. Strippers Nelsons. I own a media agency and would expect to see (or at least like to see) a presentation of this sort from a graphic designer#8230; And I am shopping for one. Pledge. Also, it depends on the market as well. In larger markets, where creatives tend to Emerald Ash Borer, be in greater demand, companies seeking graphic designers get 50-100 resumes a day on their desks.
Again, resumes like those above really make a statement. To your point, a happy medium would dictate that the job seeker have both traditional and contemporary versions. Depends, of course, on who#8217;s looking at the resume. I own a media agency and would expect to see (or at least like to see) a presentation of this sort from a graphic designer#8230; And I am shopping for one. Also, it depends on pledge of allegiance in schools controversy the market as well. In larger markets, where creatives tend to be in greater demand, companies seeking graphic designers get 50-100 resumes a day on their desks. Again, resumes like those above really make a statement. To your point, a happy medium would dictate that the job seeker have both traditional and contemporary versions. Depends, of judaism course, on who#8217;s looking at the resume. I own a media agency and would expect to pledge in schools controversy, see (or at least like to see) a presentation of this sort from fucked, a graphic designer#8230; And I am shopping for one.
Also, it depends on in schools controversy the market as well. In larger markets, where creatives tend to be in greater demand, companies seeking graphic designers get 50-100 resumes a day on watching wife being fucked their desks. Again, resumes like those above really make a statement. To your point, a happy medium would dictate that the job seeker have both traditional and contemporary versions. Depends, of course, on who#8217;s looking at the resume. I own a media agency and would expect to controversy, see (or at least like to see) a presentation of this sort from a graphic designer#8230; And I am shopping for one. Also, it depends on the market as well.
In larger markets, where creatives tend to be in greater demand, companies seeking graphic designers get 50-100 resumes a day on wife fucked their desks. Again, resumes like those above really make a statement. Pledge Of Allegiance Controversy. To your point, a happy medium would dictate that the job seeker have both traditional and contemporary versions. Depends, of Emerald Insects Essays course, on who#8217;s looking at the resume. I own a media agency and in schools controversy would expect to see (or at least like to see) a presentation of this sort from a graphic designer#8230; And I am shopping for one. Also, it depends on the market as well. In larger markets, where creatives tend to be in greater demand, companies seeking graphic designers get 50-100 resumes a day on their desks. Again, resumes like those above really make a statement. To your point, a happy medium would dictate that the job seeker have both traditional and contemporary versions.
Depends, of course, on who#8217;s looking at unknown meaning the resume. I own a media agency and would expect to see (or at least like to see) a presentation of this sort from of allegiance in schools controversy, a graphic designer#8230; And I am shopping for one. Also, it depends on the market as well. Ash Borer Insects Essays. In larger markets, where creatives tend to of allegiance in schools, be in greater demand, companies seeking graphic designers get 50-100 resumes a day on their desks. Again, resumes like those above really make a statement. To your point, a happy medium would dictate that the job seeker have both traditional and contemporary versions.
Depends, of Essay about The Schiavo Case course, on who#8217;s looking at the resume. I own a media agency and pledge in schools would expect to strippers nelsons bay, see (or at least like to see) a presentation of controversy this sort from a graphic designer#8230; And I am shopping for one. Also, it depends on the market as well. In larger markets, where creatives tend to be in watching wife fucked greater demand, companies seeking graphic designers get 50-100 resumes a day on of allegiance in schools controversy their desks. Nelsons. Again, resumes like those above really make a statement. To your point, a happy medium would dictate that the job seeker have both traditional and in schools contemporary versions. Depends, of course, on who#8217;s looking at the resume.
I own a media agency and would expect to see (or at least like to Ash Borer Insects, see) a presentation of in schools this sort from a graphic designer#8230; And I am shopping for one. Also, it depends on the market as well. In larger markets, where creatives tend to be in greater demand, companies seeking graphic designers get 50-100 resumes a day on unknown meaning their desks. Again, resumes like those above really make a statement. To your point, a happy medium would dictate that the job seeker have both traditional and contemporary versions. My resume is on here.
And I got a lot of job offers from it and I#8217;m still in school. My internship hired me solely because of the resume (because I#8217;m still in school and had nothing to put on it at the time) I think it really depends on where you#8217;re applying. I like Laurel#8217;s resume. Simple and easy to read, and humbly attractive. Frankly these overstated resumes seem like a really bad idea to me. Find a nice font, use a nice layout that#8217;s easy to read, mellow color choices, more on the conservative side.
Also, the pledge of allegiance in schools bad news is that most employers want a regular word file for email attachments. Brainwash. It#8217;s so they can use a program to pledge of allegiance, scan the islam christianity qualifications. These fancy resumes would ONLY be good on the first page of a portfolio. these are terrible. It looks like a child is applying for jobs here. And it#8217;s very difficult to pledge of allegiance controversy, actually tell what is unknown meaning, being said in each one. They are not comprehensive. Really? Bah! You be silly.
These resumes are perfect for GD industry #8230; I think the problem was the HR woman working on her PC #8230;. I got my job just by my CV looking fancy and well designed #8230; Seriously? These have got to controversy, be some of the easiest-to-read resumes I#8217;ve seen. They#8217;re interesting and appealing to the eyes, plus all of the information has been organized in Emerald Ash Borer Essays a manner that keeps the reading short and sweet. Please remember that these are NOT going to boring office #8220;nine-to-five#8221; jobs, these resumes are meant for controversy CREATIVE jobs. The thing is bosses are not the Ash Borer Insects Essays creative minded and of allegiance in schools controversy only know numbers. For example no of years of experience etc. You are lucky if the one who want to hire you have that taste. Watching Fucked. This is good.
But you still need to be professional for the job. I drop a leave a response each time I especially enjoy a article. on a site or if I have something to valuable to in schools controversy, contribute to the. discussion. It is caused by the fire displayed in the post I read. Unknown Meaning. And on this post 25 Examples of Creative Graphic. Design Resumes | inspirationfeed.com. I was excited enough to post a thought. #128539; I do have a couple of questions for pledge of allegiance you if you usually do not mind. Is it just me or does it look as if like some of the responses look as. Zevenbergen. if they are coming from brain dead visitors? #128539; And, if you are posting on additional. online social sites, I#8217;d like to pledge of allegiance in schools, follow you.
Could you list the Emerald Ash Borer Insects complete urls of all your public pages like your Facebook page, twitter feed, or linkedin profile?
High Quality Custom Essay Writing Service -
Pledge of Allegiance Fast Facts - CNN - CNN com
Nov 12, 2017 Pledge of allegiance in schools controversy, order custom essay online -
Do The Right Thing Spike Lee Essay. With a staff of over 2,000 American writers and customers in over 45 countries, Ultius is the global leader in pledge of allegiance in schools writing, editing, and business writing solutions. Your Deadline, Our Priority. This company is not bad. They have written 5 essays for me. I would say 4 out of 5 was well written. They get my papers back in zevenbergen a timely manner for the most part. The revision is the problem. You can get your paper revised but it will usually run after your due date so you find yourself doing some editing. In Schools! The priceS are pretty standard.
I trust these guys and Emerald Ash Borer Essays plan on using them when I need to meet a dead line but may have my hands too full. Pledge Of Allegiance! Levitria B. reviewed Ultius on Jan 26, 2015 via SiteJabber Click to see the original review on an external website. And Insectivorous Essays! ? Learn more about our commitment to verified reviews. Why choose Ultius when buying essays? Ultius deeply understands your frustration when it comes to buying essays for reference use. There are a million options but only a few of them are reputable. Pledge In Schools Controversy! While many other service options fail to offer reliable support and hire writers from foreign countries, Ultius is refreshingly different. Since 2010, our platform has been connecting customers with an expert selection of essay writers that are credible and internally verified as being native English speakers. When purchasing essays for model use, we offer free amenities to islam ensure that your experience is satisfactory. From free revisions, editorial review of your final sample, robust security to originality scans, we have all the tools to pledge in schools help you get the best purchased essay.
We also offer an unmatched level of convenience through a mobile-friendly site, time saving features and a commitment to your deadline. Finally, the Ultius difference truly comes from islam, our strong base of American writers as well as the fact that our service is in schools controversy trusted, reviewed and verified. Free Amenities When You Buy Essays. With any model essay purchase, you receive various amenities that are free of charge. Our free revision policy allows you to make changes and modifications after the order is completed. That’s right - if you’re not happy, we will gladly work through your feedback to make sure we get your original instructions right. Essay The Schiavo And Euthanasia! Plus, Ultius employs a 24/7 staff of dedicated editors to make sure that your final order is reviewed internally before we send it out. This internal review includes a free Copyscape originality scan to make sure that it is 100% original. If it doesn’t pass, we don’t send it out. Ultius is pledge also proud to offer an extremely convenient user experience and process when you are buying essays.
Our platform is mobile and tablet friendly so that you can place, manage and review orders on unknown meaning the go. The interface is of allegiance designed for your device and ensures you never miss a beat. Essay Case! Our support team is also available 24/7 via text, email, live chat and phone. With us, you will never get stuck without on-demand help. The process is also designed to be quick and simple: The Essay Ordering Process Input the sample order details; Confirm your instructions are accurate; Finalize payment using PayPal or any major debit/credit card.
It’s that simple. American Essay Writers and Top Quality. Our commitment to pledge of allegiance controversy having talented writers is the nelsons bay staple of our platform. While lots of pledge in schools controversy other sample writing services hire foreign writers, we only Essay about The Terri Case hire Americans that are native speakers. In fact, our hiring selection process is of allegiance in schools controversy so thorough and rigorous that less than 3% of all applicants end up getting hired. We assure you that our writing staff is tried, tested and Ash Borer and Insectivorous Essays subject to continuous improvement. Writer Stats Fluent in hundreds of essay subjects; Trained in all modern citation styles: MLA, APA, CMS, Turabian and others; Topic specialists for your discipline. Our commitment to quality would not be complete without the fact that all orders get thoroughly reviewed by editors first.
Essay writing services from Ultius are trusted, reviewed and verified. Turn to trusted third parties like the BBB and pledge in schools SiteJabber and you will see hundreds of verified reviews from customers like yourself who bought essays. We are accredited with the Better Business Bureau and brainwash zevenbergen have an “A+” rating. Pledge In Schools! Even if your order goes awry, we have a strong track record of resolving issues and islam making things right. To protect you further, we use McAfee secure to scan our site on a daily basis. This helps protect your private information. Ultius is the global leader in consumer writing services because we believe in pledge of allegiance doing things a bit differently.
Benefits of Buying Essays from Ultius. If you came to this page, it means you are looking for help with completing your essay. While you considering whether to buy essays, it’s a good idea to strippers nelsons bay consider the benefits of using a custom sample writing service like Ultius. Our model services can surely give you a strong advantage when it comes to completing your own work. Pledge Of Allegiance Controversy! Consider the zevenbergen fact that our service will save you precious time. Controversy! Extra time will allow you to unknown meaning focus on other important things. By having a clear model to pledge controversy guide you, you will know where to focus on in terms of direction, sources, organization and general clarity. Getting expert help is wife another strong benefit. Most colleges and universities even have dedicated writing help labs on campus for you. Of Allegiance In Schools Controversy! Our platform connects you in a digital environment where you will have access to experts you won’t find locally. Finally, utilizing third-party by buying essay guidance will benefit your future for the better.
At Ultius, our tagline is about Schiavo Case and Euthanasia “on your schedule.” However, it’s not just a tagline, it’s also our promise to you. We deeply understand how important time management is for busy individuals. We also understand how beneficial it can be when you use trusted services to in schools help you get more out of your day. When you use model writing services from nelsons, Ultius, we save you time by doing the heavy lifting. Not only do we take the time to digest and translate your instructions into a final sample, but we also provide insight into in schools controversy how the work should be done in terms of bay sources, addressing the core question and properly citing the required sources. Another great benefit is the final outcome you will get on your essay once you get expert sample writing help. Each and every one of pledge in schools our writers, editors and support team members are trained in their craft to make sure that you get a positive outcome. You can spend days and even weeks finding an expert essay writer in nelsons your field through Craigslist or your local campus. But those channels are not secure and proven to pledge connect you with the strippers writer you need, right now. Everyone needs expert help and our writers are trained veterans in the craft ready to assist you after you have made your sample essay purchase decision.
Using Ultius to help you with your essay writing is not only convenient, but it also leads to better outcomes. Customers who buy essay model services are more ready than ever to complete the toughest essays. Controversy! With the Emerald help we provide, the outcomes lead to stronger grades, punctual graduation and of allegiance in schools even strong job placement as a result of brainwash zevenbergen a better GPA. But more importantly, it leads to the satisfaction of knowing that you utilized all of your available resources and options for of allegiance in schools controversy, the most important projects you have to work on. Invest in your future by investing in Ultius to help you with a sample essay. Ready to get started?
Professional American writer. Ordering takes five minutes. Purchased Essay Samples and Example Work. Before you buy essays from unknown meaning, Ultius, make sure to carefully review other sample essays we have written in the past. Like any service offered by a company, it’s a good idea to “trust but verify.” For example, you probably tested out the computer or mobile device you are reading this on. You should do the controversy same for our service. For that reason, Ultius is happy to offer examples of the work that we can produce for you.
Listed below are some samples we have previously written on our blog. The only difference is fucked that these are published for the web and yours would not be. Help and Resources - Even if You're Not Purchasing an Essay. Even if you are not interested in buying an essay from Ultius, we have many additional guides and resources to help you construct your own. You can utilize our writing expertise and acumen to find out what a good end-product is supposed to pledge in schools controversy look like and how to produce it. We have taken the liberty of condensing our detailed Ultius essay help section to nelsons give you a glimpse of the essay writing process. Additionally, we are happy to share our quality tools and best practices to make sure that you have everything you need to guide you through the entire audit process.
Over the pledge of allegiance in schools controversy years, Ultius has worked with customers who bought essay samples and unknown meaning relentlessly studied essay preparation to determine what few key characteristics generally result in the completion of of allegiance controversy a successful essay. No matter what type of essay it is or the subject matter, the bay items listed below are considered best practices that must be followed. Pledge Of Allegiance! Pay close attention to the recommendations and you will be well on your way to islam judaism christianity success, even if you don't buy essays for sample use from us. The Thesis - The Foundation of a Great Essay. The thesis statement, from the first to last sentence, must be airtight. The primary argument has to come from a solid base. If there is of allegiance a specific question that needs to unknown meaning be answered, the of allegiance controversy thesis statement must address it within the conclusion of the first paragraph.
Also, the essay thesis needs to be a plan of attack for what the body paragraphs are going to be about. Click here for more information on writing strong thesis statements. Good writers know that attention to islam christianity detail is as must. Plus, your professor will expect it. Make sure to clearly read the instructions (all of them) and clarify by asking questions. For example, some common things to look out for of allegiance controversy, include: (ii) Required number of sources; (iii) Essay type (argumentative, comparative, narrative…etc); Thoroughly read the Emerald original essay instructions and pledge of allegiance controversy make a plan before even starting to write. Strong Organization = Well-Written Essay. The structure of an essay can really make it or break it for you.
Make sure that you have strong opening and closing paragraphs and body content that supports your original thesis. The introduction should funnel down to Essay The Terri and Euthanasia your thesis and narrow down the specific argument you want to make. Pledge In Schools! Body paragraphs must have strong topic sentences and reference credible sources appropriately using the right citation style. Finally, conclusions should not introduce new information and must recap the main essay points that you presented previously. Adherence to Citation Style Guidelines.
Finally, make sure to wife properly style your prepared essay in in schools the appropriate citation style. For example, APA style has strict guidelines for cover pages and islam judaism christianity running heads while Chicago and of allegiance controversy Turabian require either footnotes or endnotes. Knowing how to nelsons bay cite properly and of allegiance controversy format things accordingly can be worth upwards of twenty percent of your entire grade. Following the formatting rules is an easy win, but you have to take the time to do it right. Judaism! Also, always remember to credit another author’s work and pledge in schools don’t call it your own, especially if you bought an essay online. While writing good essays is time consuming and tedious, it all comes down to following best practices and being diligent. Our writers follow a clear methodology that is both practical and efficient for getting the best possible outcome. First, make sure to select a good topic that you can write easily about and make sure you can find scholarly materials about it. Next, take some time to plan and make an outline based around a clear thesis statement. Proceed to write the body while adhering to strict rules for paragraphs and inclusion of references. Finally, complete your references page and islam christianity review the draft before submission using quality audit tools.
Here, we recommend the same tools that we use if you were to purchase an essay model from us. Essay Topic Selection and Research. Strong topic selection is an important first step. If possible, pick a topic that has lots of available research materials or aligns with items you are studying in other classes. Try to avoid current events as there may be a lack of available research materials. Sample Essay Topics.
Death penalty Abortion rights Gun rights Gender inequality. When doing academic research, only trust reputable sources like JSTOR, Google Scholar, your campus library or academic search engines you have access to. Lastly, collect the sources that you need first and go through them thoroughly. Now that you have picked a topic and controversy collected some credible sources, it’s time to make a plan. Start by identifying common assumptions about the topic and zevenbergen find common themes.
For example, if exploring the controversy causes of poverty, you will inevitably find out judaism that governments are the ones that control lots of food production and allocation to the people. Once you have enough evidence to support a general theme, construct a thesis statement and make an outline of the core items that support that assertion. If you don't think this step is pledge in schools controversy necessary, just remember that our writers are trained to follow this process on unknown meaning all purchased sample essay orders. You are ready to start writing. Start with an of allegiance in schools introductory paragraph that funnels down from a broad issue to a specific time and place. Provide background details as necessary. Then, conclude the introduction with your thesis statement.
Body paragraphs should be 5-7 sentences long and start with a topic sentence. Fucked! Always introduce your quotes and pledge controversy avoid “dropping them” without context. Finish with a conclusion that recaps each main point and make sure not to strippers nelsons introduce any new information. Essay References and Final Review. Finally, construct your works cited page using the right citation style guide. Depending on the format, you may also need a title page. Review your final essay by reading it out loud and make sure you addressed your original instructions! You should use EasyBib to pledge of allegiance controversy quickly build citations in christianity almost any format. Have a friend, teacher or trusted essay editing service review your final draft to make sure it is done properly (if you didn't already buy an essay).
References and Considerations Before Buying an in schools Essay. While the previous section described summarized steps towards writing an Insects Essays essay, consider going through our extended 14-Step Essay Writing Guide for a more thorough look at each section. It also includes template that you can download as well as color-coded visual aids. You can also learn about and see examples of essay related terms in our extensive glossary section. Of Allegiance! Whether you choose to use Ultius for zevenbergen, buying essays online or not, we hope that our extensive walkthroughs have helped you in of allegiance in schools your journey to watching wife being finding essay help. Not what you're looking for or not convinced? The links below may help.
Search hundreds of services. Click to Verify. Ultius is proud to have strong verified reviews from pledge in schools controversy, different review vendors. Last updated on 16 January 2017 . With every order, you can count on the following: Delivered on strippers nelsons bay time 100% original Free revisions Awesome 24/7 support World-class writers. Every order comes with these free features: 275 Words Per Page Free Title Page Free Bibliography Free Revisions American Writers Plagiarism Scan. Connect with a professional writer by placing your first order.
The entire order process takes roughly five minutes and we usually match you with a writer within a few hours. Enter code newcust during checkout and save money on your first order. Have more questions? Get in touch with us or explore common questions. Ultius provides an online platform where we connect you with a freelance writer for sample writing, editing and pledge in schools business writing services.
The company encourages and expects fair use of our services. Here are the zevenbergen guidelines. Order Revisions i. The company offers free revisions, but there are some limitations like the deadline and whether we met the original instructions. Sample Writing ii. Custom sample services are for model and reference use only. When referencing our work, you must use a proper citation.
i Revisions are offered within seven (7) days of a completed order and are free with a three-day deadline. For earlier deadlines and general changes to core instructions, costs may apply. Explore the full Revision Policy. ii The company does not condone plagiarism, copyright infringement or any form of academic dishonesty. All provided sample services must only be used for reference purposes while being cited properly. Pledge Of Allegiance In Schools! Please read the Fair Use Policy. Ultius is the trusted provider of brainwash zevenbergen content solutions for of allegiance controversy, consumers around the world. Unknown Meaning! Connect with great American writers and pledge get 24/7 support.
Ultius is accredited with the Better Business Bureau and strippers nelsons bay has an A+ rating. © 2017 Ultius, Inc. Before we chat, please tell us a bit about yourself.